Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming K7

Performance Results


Gaming 27% Raft	Desktop 79% Battleship	Workstation 28% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	32.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	57.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming K7 (all builds)
Memory	13.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170616
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jul 13 '17 at 11:45
Run Duration	159 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	15%

Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 1800X-$60 30,050 User benchmarks, average bench 72% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)	75.8% Very good	Memory 71.1 1-Core 113 2-Core 227 75% 137 Pts	4-Core 431 8-Core 788 73% 609 Pts	64-Core 1,207 75% 1,207 Pts
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 75.8% Great: 82%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Zotac(19DA 2454) CLim: 2012 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 384.76 Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	32.5% Below average	Lighting 40.5 Reflection 32.4 Parallax 38.6 33% 37.2 fps	MRender 38.8 Gravity 39 Splatting 37.4 31% 38.4 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 32.5% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow UV400 480GB-$175 24,007 User benchmarks, average bench 73% 268GB free (System drive) Firmware: 0C3FD6SD Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 89 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 3115 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 157 (64) Unknown 100 100 3456576 (65) Unknown 100 100 709760 (AA) Unknown 100 100 0 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AE) Unknown 100 100 346 (AF) Unknown 100 100 0 (B0) Unknown 100 100 0 (B1) Unknown 99 99 529 (B2) Unknown 100 100 0 (B4) Unknown 100 100 2687 (B7) Unknown 100 100 8 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 26 100 188979478554 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 89 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 100 100 0 (CC) Soft ECC correction 100 100 89 (E7) Temperature 99 99 1 (E9) Unknown 100 100 5331 (EA) Unknown 100 100 3410 (F1) Unknown 100 100 4344 (F2) Unknown 100 100 7930 (FA) Read error retry rate 100 100 89	57.4% Above average	Read 470 Write 264 Mixed 263 73% 332 MB/s	4K Read 27.7 4K Write 39.8 4K Mixed 9.22 75% 25.6 MB/s	DQ Read 25.6 DQ Write 30.8 DQ Mixed 7.24 11% 21.2 MB/s
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 57.4% Great: 92%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$109 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 157GB free Firmware: EMT01B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (37^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 5988 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 628 (B1) Unknown 99 99 10 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 73 48 27 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 200 (F1) Unknown 99 99 11545978877	108% Outstanding	Read 515 Write 415 Mixed 422 100% 451 MB/s	4K Read 42.7 4K Write 78.8 4K Mixed 45.1 164% 55.5 MB/s	DQ Read 291 DQ Write 224 DQ Mixed 25.9 82% 180 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 108% Great: 134%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$50 815,515 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 1.5TB free Firmware: CC25 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (46^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 109 99 25108440 (03) Spinup time 97 96 0 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 1621 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 63 60 2608144 (09) Power-on hours count 96 96 3614 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 402 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 95 95 5 (BE) vendor-specific 78 50 370409494 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 329 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 98 98 4168 (C2) HDA temperature 22 50 51539607574 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 -13348758355554 (F1) Unknown 100 253 9054921488 (F2) Unknown 100 253 17691325513	88.6% Excellent	Read 189 Write 121 Mixed 161 118% 157 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.53 4K Mixed 0.2 67% 0.71 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 88.6% Great: 114%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$63 235,501 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 787GB free Firmware: CC43 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 114 99 63748192 (03) Spinup time 91 90 0 (04) Start/Stop count 92 92 8541 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 56 48 695854279591 (09) Power-on hours count 71 71 26041 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 2583 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 99 4295032833 (BD) vendor-specific 80 80 20 (BE) vendor-specific 77 41 1134258552855 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 1924 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 94 94 13809 (C2) HDA temperature 23 59 -140737488355305 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 3 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 -91057601627484 (F1) Unknown 100 253 112729805233 (F2) Unknown 100 253 88618315785	61.6% Good	Read 104 Write 111 Mixed 127 86% 114 MB/s	4K Read 0.52 4K Write 1.08 4K Mixed 0.2 64% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 61.6% Great: 113%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB 239,203 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	39.4% Below average	MC Read 15 MC Write 11.6 MC Mixed 12.1 37% 12.9 GB/s	SC Read 15.4 SC Write 15.5 SC Mixed 15 44% 15.3 GB/s	Latency 98.8 40% 98.8 ns
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 39.4% Great: 111%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-AX370-Gaming K7 Builds (Compare 523 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 79%

Battleship

Desktop 79%

Battleship

Workstation 77%

Battleship

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming K7 - $229

CPU
Ryzen 7 1800XAMD $60Bench 72%, 30,050 samples	96x
Ryzen 7 1700XAMD $225Bench 71%, 66,470 samples	69x
Ryzen 7 1700AMD $195Bench 69%, 144,475 samples	59x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	67x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	57x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	28x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	22x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 213%, 165,668 samples	20x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GBSamsung $45Bench 199%, 240,629 samples	17x

RAM
Flare X DDR4 3200 C14 2x8GBG.SKILL $73Bench 98%, 54,616 samples	20x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $37Bench 84%, 287,720 samples	18x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	11x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $871

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming K7

Performance Results

Run History

PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming K7 - $229

Feedback

PC Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)