Asus PRIME X370-PRO

Performance Results


Gaming 49% Yacht	Desktop 86% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 50% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	49.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	88.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus PRIME X370-PRO (all builds)
Memory	29.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170620
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jul 14 '17 at 06:34
Run Duration	373 Seconds
Run User	NZL-User
Background CPU	14%

PC Performing as expected (59^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 1800X-$60 30,050 User benchmarks, average bench 72% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	82.6% Excellent	Memory 80.5 1-Core 115 2-Core 228 79% 141 Pts	4-Core 454 8-Core 908 80% 681 Pts	64-Core 1,251 77% 1,251 Pts
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 82.6% Great: 82%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 780-$329 50,279 User benchmarks, average bench 45% EVGA(3842 0784) 3GB CLim: 1306 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 382.5 Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	49.9% Average	Lighting 60.8 Reflection 53.5 Parallax 68.4 50% 60.9 fps	MRender 70.4 Gravity 67.8 Splatting 51.8 51% 63.3 fps
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 49.9% Great: 49%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$109 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 301GB free Firmware: EMT01B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 97 97 11671 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 465 (B1) Unknown 98 98 35 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 66 38 34 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 20 (F1) Unknown 99 99 34271673748	106% Outstanding	Read 517 Write 405 Mixed 418 99% 447 MB/s	4K Read 41 4K Write 78.9 4K Mixed 44.7 161% 54.9 MB/s	DQ Read 266 DQ Write 219 DQ Mixed 107 117% 198 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 106% Great: 134%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$109 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 241GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT01B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 97 97 11677 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 476 (B1) Unknown 99 99 15 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 66 53 34 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 29 (F1) Unknown 99 99 16162882311	88.5% Excellent	Read 518 Write 410 Mixed 420 100% 449 MB/s	4K Read 40.7 4K Write 80.2 4K Mixed 24.9 136% 48.6 MB/s	DQ Read 41.6 DQ Write 80.6 DQ Mixed 24.2 29% 48.8 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 88.5% Great: 134%
OCZ Vertex 3 MAX IOPS 120GB-$106 3,124 User benchmarks, average bench 73% 49GB free Firmware: 2.25 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (47^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 4452952 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 66 66 133547713132169 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1355 (AB) Unknown 0 0 0 (AC) Unknown 0 0 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 260 (B1) Unknown 0 0 12 (B5) Unknown 0 0 0 (B6) Unknown 0 0 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 30 30 128850984990 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 120 120 4452952 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 120 120 4452952 (CC) Soft ECC correction 120 120 4452952 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 100 (E7) Temperature 94 94 0 (E9) Unknown 0 0 34650 (EA) Unknown 0 0 31886 (F1) Unknown 0 0 31886 (F2) Unknown 0 0 23440	73% Very good	Read 508 Write 193 Mixed 278 72% 326 MB/s	4K Read 27.8 4K Write 78.9 4K Mixed 18.1 107% 41.6 MB/s	DQ Read 209 DQ Write 226 DQ Mixed 10.2 65% 148 MB/s
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 73% Great: 88%
Seagate Expansion Desk 5TB 11,776 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 2TB free Firmware: 0911 Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)	66.7% Good	Read 118 Write 113 Mixed 82 78% 104 MB/s	4K Read 0.49 4K Write 6.85 4K Mixed 0.62 216% 2.65 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 66.7% Great: 87%
WD Black 3TB (2013)-$151 16,992 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 356GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 172 141 10400 (04) Start/Stop count 93 93 7536 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 77 77 16822 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 513 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 44 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 198 198 7491 (C2) HDA temperature 122 101 30 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	90.9% Outstanding	Read 177 Write 139 Mixed 116 108% 144 MB/s	4K Read 0.85 4K Write 2.44 4K Mixed 0.24 107% 1.18 MB/s
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 90.9% Great: 100%
Generic STORAGE DEVICE 64GB 737 User benchmarks, average bench 29% 43GB free, PID 4000 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)	20.1% Poor	Read 88.8 Write 11.6 Mixed 13.3 33% 37.9 MB/s	4K Read 7.07 4K Write 0.99 4K Mixed 0.43 75% 2.83 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 20.1% Great: 47%
SanDisk Cruzer Glide 3.0 16GB 2,979 User benchmarks, average bench 19% 14GB free, PID 5597 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Performing as expected (47^th percentile)	16.9% Very poor	Read 36 Write 9.46 Mixed 13.3 20% 19.6 MB/s	4K Read 5.41 4K Write 2.72 4K Mixed 1.55 166% 3.23 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 16.9% Great: 28%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair CMU32GX4M2C3000C15 2x16GB 6,222 User benchmarks, average bench 81% 2 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 2933 MHz clocked @ 1467 MHz Performing below potential (95^th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	101% Outstanding	MC Read 40 MC Write 35.8 MC Mixed 34.6 105% 36.8 GB/s	SC Read 23.3 SC Write 39.5 SC Mixed 29 88% 30.6 GB/s	Latency 79.6 50% 79.6 ns
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 101% Great: 102%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical PRIME X370-PRO Builds (Compare 2,520 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 74%

Battleship

Desktop 75%

Battleship

Workstation 72%

Battleship

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X370-PRO - $109

CPU
Ryzen 7 1700AMD $195Bench 69%, 144,475 samples	415x
Ryzen 7 1700XAMD $225Bench 71%, 66,470 samples	326x
Ryzen 5 1600AMD $110Bench 70%, 392,253 samples	204x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	214x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	194x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	188x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	94x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	89x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GBSamsung $45Bench 199%, 240,629 samples	75x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	160x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	122x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $39Bench 84%, 287,720 samples	57x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $847

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Asus PRIME X370-PRO

Performance Results

PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X370-PRO - $109

Feedback

PC Performing as expected (59^th percentile)