Asus H81M-PLUS

Performance Results

Benchmarks - excluding HDD, RAM
Gaming 0%
Desktop 0%
Workstation 0%
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (78th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 22 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.2%, this CPUs suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics40.7% is a reasonable 3D score (GTX 1070 = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive99.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
MotherboardAsus H81M-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory6.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20141127
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 13 '15 at 22:18
Run Duration152 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (78th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Single core Quad core Multi core
Intel Core i3-4150-$144
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
57.2% Above average
SC Int 98
SC Float 100
SC Mixed 99
79% 99.1 Pts
QC Int 242
QC Float 281
QC Mixed 265
59% 263 Pts
MC Int 241
MC Float 277
MC Mixed 262
39% 260 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 57.2%
Great: 59%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
AMD HD 7950-$290
Sapphire(174B E208) 3GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1004
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
40.7% Average
Lighting 121
Reflection 78.6
Parallax 171
43% 124 fps
MRender 59.4
Gravity 124
Splatting 86.9
39% 89.9 fps
Poor: 32%
This bench: 40.7%
Great: 44%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
OCZ Vertex 460A 120GB-$88
94GB free
Firmware: 1.01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
99.3% Outstanding
Read 508
Write 414
Mixed 439
101% 454 MB/s
4K Read 28.1
4K Write 107
4K Mixed 25.1
131% 53.3 MB/s
DQ Read 319
DQ Write 352
DQ Mixed 74.4
128% 248 MB/s
Poor: 61%
This bench: 99.3%
Great: 99%
General USB Flash Disk 32GB
11GB free, PID 1000
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
10.4% Very poor
Read 34.8
Write 14.4
Mixed 6.33
19% 18.5 MB/s
4K Read 5.37
4K Write 0.32
4K Mixed 0.26
40% 1.98 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 10.4%
Great: 33%
Take a copy of your results
Typical H81M-PLUS Builds (Compare 2,893 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming 41%
Speed boat
Desktop 61%
Workstation 39%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus H81M-PLUS - $90

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 75% - Very good Total price: $562
The Best.
Intel Core i7-8700K $330Nvidia GTX 1070 $447Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $90
Intel Core i7-7700K $290Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $300Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $137
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 $170AMD RX 480 $350Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $163
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $44Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $183SanDisk Extreme 64GB $70
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $75G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $957SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $60Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $193SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $12
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback