Asus X99-DELUXE

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 6% Tree trunk	Desktop 68% Battle cruiser	Workstation 6% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	2.05% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

Motherboard	Asus X99-DELUXE (all builds)
Memory	12.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20160504
Uptime	9.3 Days
Run Date	Jul 21 '17 at 16:05
Run Duration	333 Seconds
Run User	SAU-User
Background CPU	5%

PC Performing as expected (50^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-5930K-$70 34,039 User benchmarks, average bench 80% SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)	83.8% Excellent	Memory 89.1 1-Core 104 2-Core 206 77% 133 Pts	4-Core 422 8-Core 698 68% 560 Pts	64-Core 852 53% 852 Pts
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 83.8% Great: 91%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 610 62,458 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Gigabyte(1458 3623) 2GB CLim: 810 MHz, MLim: 333 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 353.62 Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	2.05% Terrible	Lighting 2.5 Reflection 3.04 Parallax 1.94 2% 2.49 fps	MRender 3.1 Gravity 2.5 Splatting 2.22 2% 2.6 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 2.05% Great: 2%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$24 574,344 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 54GB free Firmware: KC48 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 113 99 424 (03) Spinup time 97 97 0 (04) Start/Stop count 96 96 4528 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 75 60 39159275 (09) Power-on hours count 86 86 12619 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 367 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 68 58 656080928 (C2) HDA temperature 32 42 94489280544 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 55 38 424 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 -54266911779022 (F1) Unknown 100 253 3449581712 (F2) Unknown 100 253 35813619	43.3% Average	Read 74.7 Write 76.2 Mixed 80 58% 76.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.49 4K Write 0.84 4K Mixed 0.7 114% 0.68 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 43.3% Great: 88%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 27GB free (System drive) Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 179 (03) Spinup time 174 173 2266 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 268 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 82 82 13159 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 268 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 187 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 200 200 302 (C2) HDA temperature 108 101 35 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 1 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	48.8% Average	Read 86.1 Write 83.8 Mixed 97.7 68% 89.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.3 4K Write 1.85 4K Mixed 0.19 68% 0.78 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 48.8% Great: 109%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 6TB 120 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 3TB free, PID d011 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	71.8% Very good	Read 171 Write 172 Mixed 157 214% 167 MB/s	4K Read 11.6 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 0.3 128% 4.69 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 71.8% Great: 83%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 2TB 9,084 User benchmarks, average bench 35% 270GB free, PID a202 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)	28.1% Poor	Read 68.8 Write 63.7 Mixed 46 74% 59.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.47 4K Write 1.33 4K Mixed 0.17 53% 0.66 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 28.1% Great: 49%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB 3,454 User benchmarks, average bench 31% 38GB free, PID a00d Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)	26.1% Poor	Read 59.9 Write 58.9 Mixed 57.5 76% 58.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.33 4K Write 1.47 4K Mixed 0.2 58% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 26.1% Great: 44%
TOSHIBA TransMemory 64GB 812 User benchmarks, average bench 16% 24GB free, PID 6545 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	26.7% Poor	Read 114 Write 19.7 Mixed 35.7 55% 56.5 MB/s	4K Read 6.41 4K Write 1.39 4K Mixed 0.98 104% 2.93 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 26.7% Great: 30%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB 160 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 24GB free, PID a00b Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing as expected (45^th percentile)	26.6% Poor	Read 67.5 Write 57.4 Mixed 49.9 72% 58.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.29 4K Write 1.38 4K Mixed 0.18 54% 0.62 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 26.6% Great: 44%
WD USB Elements Device 500GB 146 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 12GB free, PID 6031 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)	18.1% Very poor	Read 38.1 Write 38.3 Mixed 37.5 49% 38 MB/s	4K Read 0.36 4K Write 1.36 4K Mixed 0.18 54% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 18.1% Great: 21%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x8GB 236,291 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 2 of 8 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	67.4% Good	MC Read 28.2 MC Write 21.4 MC Mixed 22.8 69% 24.1 GB/s	SC Read 15.3 SC Write 19.7 SC Mixed 19.6 52% 18.2 GB/s	Latency 68.3 58% 68.3 ns
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 67.4% Great: 97%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X99-DELUXE Builds (Compare 1,864 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 82%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 82%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 73%

Battleship

Motherboard: Asus X99-DELUXE - $170

CPU
Core i7-5820KIntel $130Bench 77%, 101,694 samples	835x
Core i7-5930KIntel $70Bench 80%, 34,039 samples	462x
Core i7-5960XIntel $285Bench 80%, 15,468 samples	282x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	148x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	142x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	123x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	77x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	54x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $90Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	49x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2666 C16 4x4GBCorsair $115Bench 88%, 5,380 samples	38x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2800 C16 4x4GBCorsair $210Bench 88%, 3,970 samples	31x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2666 C16 4x8GBCorsair $92Bench 85%, 8,498 samples	29x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 62% - Good

Total price: $910

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16