Asus M5A97 R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 57%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 47%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics87.3% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive73.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus M5A97 R2.0  (all builds)
Memory12 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140407
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateJul 31 '17 at 02:42
Run Duration232 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU9%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8350-$130
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
66.7% Good
Memory 86.6
1-Core 70.6
2-Core 137
60% 98.1 Pts
4-Core 254
8-Core 431
42% 343 Pts
64-Core 431
27% 431 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 66.7%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132
Device(0000 0000) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 382.33
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
87.3% Excellent
Lighting 111
Reflection 110
Parallax 97
90% 106 fps
MRender 97.7
Gravity 99.8
Splatting 99.9
81% 99.1 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 87.3%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$95
81GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0DB6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
73.8% Very good
Read 485
Write 309
Mixed 330
83% 374 MB/s
4K Read 33.7
4K Write 41.3
4K Mixed 20.9
100% 32 MB/s
DQ Read 167
DQ Write 97.8
DQ Mixed 52
60% 106 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 73.8%
Great: 118%
Toshiba DT01ACA300 3TB-$80
273GB free
Firmware: MX6OABB0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
70.7% Very good
Read 136
Write 111
Mixed 99.9
86% 115 MB/s
4K Read 1.06
4K Write 1.85
4K Mixed 0.21
102% 1.04 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 70.7%
Great: 107%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$70
236GB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
44.4% Average
Read 92.7
Write 61.8
Mixed 70.1
56% 74.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.45
4K Write 1.59
4K Mixed 0.18
68% 0.74 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 44.4%
Great: 67%
Samsung Spinpoint F3 1TB-$83
264GB free
Firmware: 1AJ10001 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
52.6% Above average
Read 91.5
Write 91.4
Mixed 74.7
64% 85.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.47
4K Write 2.28
4K Mixed 0.37
102% 1.04 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 52.6%
Great: 75%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1866 CL10 Series 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 800 MHz
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
30.4% Below average
MC Read 10.5
MC Write 10.1
MC Mixed 9
28% 9.87 GB/s
SC Read 9.6
SC Write 6.8
SC Mixed 8.6
24% 8.33 GB/s
Latency 70.8
56% 70.8 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 30.4%
Great: 68%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M5A97 R2.0 Builds (Compare 2,815 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus M5A97 R2.0 - $89

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 70% - Very good Total price: $358
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback