Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 47.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Boot Drive	82.6% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2650 0 1,097 User benchmarks, average bench 59% CPU1, 2 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	47.9% Average	Memory 56.7 1-Core 52.7 2-Core 106 43% 71.6 Pts	4-Core 211 8-Core 413 37% 312 Pts	64-Core 1,059 66% 1,059 Pts
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 47.9% Great: 65%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 201GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT01B6Q Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	82.6% Excellent	Read 498 Write 410 Mixed 417 98% 442 MB/s	4K Read 28.9 4K Write 39.4 4K Mixed 24.1 96% 30.8 MB/s	DQ Read 189 DQ Write 198 DQ Mixed 88.7 96% 159 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 82.6% Great: 124%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016)-$51 462,780 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 2TB free Firmware: CC26 Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	110% Outstanding	Read 203 Write 179 Mixed 169 138% 184 MB/s	4K Read 0.76 4K Write 1.79 4K Mixed 0.18 85% 0.91 MB/s
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 110% Great: 114%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
CE00B300CE00 M393B1K70DH0-YH9 8x8GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 102% 8 of 16 slots used 64GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	113% Outstanding	MC Read 59.5 MC Write 40.3 MC Mixed 45 138% 48.3 GB/s	SC Read 8.3 SC Write 3.8 SC Mixed 4.5 16% 5.53 GB/s	Latency 138 29% 138 ns
Poor: 78% ↑ This bench: 113% Great: 116%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16