Gigabyte GA-870A-UD3

Performance Results


Gaming 14% Tree trunk	Desktop 64% Destroyer	Workstation 11% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	18.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	44.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-870A-UD3 (all builds)
Memory	5.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20100607
Uptime	0.4 Days
Run Date	Aug 05 '17 at 20:28
Run Duration	178 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	1%

PC Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Phenom II X4 970 2,539 User benchmarks, average bench 56% Socket M2, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	59.5% Above average	Memory 84.2 1-Core 51.4 2-Core 103 51% 79.7 Pts	4-Core 204 8-Core 205 27% 204 Pts	64-Core 206 13% 206 Pts
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 59.5% Great: 62%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 560 Ti-$188 42,397 User benchmarks, average bench 16% MSI(1462 2382) 1GB CLim: 880 MHz, MLim: 1050 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 384.94 Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	18.3% Very poor	Lighting 21.4 Reflection 25 Parallax 19.2 17% 21.9 fps	MRender 28.1 Gravity 22 Splatting 23.2 20% 24.4 fps
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 18.3% Great: 18%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 830 128GB-$109 37,250 User benchmarks, average bench 63% 5GB free (System drive) Firmware: CXM01B1Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 97 97 14429 (0C) Power cycle count 95 95 4098 (B1) Unknown 82 82 633 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 63 56 37 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 253 253 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 52 (F1) Unknown 99 99 20193293970	44.5% Average	Read 373 Write 201 Mixed 100 49% 225 MB/s	4K Read 17.1 4K Write 41.5 4K Mixed 6.88 57% 21.8 MB/s	DQ Read 19.8 DQ Write 32.8 DQ Mixed 6.64 11% 19.7 MB/s
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 44.5% Great: 76%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$50 815,515 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 2TB free Firmware: CC43 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 119 99 205141456 (03) Spinup time 96 94 0 (04) Start/Stop count 95 95 5430 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 60 60 1301623 (09) Power-on hours count 91 91 7892 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 2174 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 99 99 1 (BE) vendor-specific 71 60 487981085 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 16 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 96 96 9559 (C2) HDA temperature 29 40 55834574877 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 -16690242911725 (F1) Unknown 100 253 872476568 (F2) Unknown 100 253 1022376073	102% Outstanding	Read 178 Write 178 Mixed 110 115% 155 MB/s	4K Read 0.75 4K Write 1.81 4K Mixed 0.24 91% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 102% Great: 114%
Samsung Spinpoint F1 1TB-$100 65,786 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 72GB free Firmware: 1AA01118 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 70 70 9700 (04) Start/Stop count 87 87 13010 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 8456 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 94 94 5667 (0D) Soft read error rate 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 82 60 303169554 (C2) HDA temperature 74 59 437387290 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 23090 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 253 253 0	33.7% Below average	Read 34 Write 83.2 Mixed 35.9 38% 51 MB/s	4K Read 0.36 4K Write 1.88 4K Mixed 0.28 81% 0.84 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 33.7% Great: 62%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x4GB 424,126 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 2 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM Performing as expected (44^th percentile)	34.1% Below average	MC Read 14.4 MC Write 7.8 MC Mixed 12.8 33% 11.7 GB/s	SC Read 7.3 SC Write 6.3 SC Mixed 9.6 22% 7.73 GB/s	Latency 73.1 55% 73.1 ns
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 34.1% Great: 65%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-870A-UD3 Builds (Compare 196 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 19%

Surfboard

Desktop 61%

Destroyer

Workstation 14%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-870A-UD3

CPU
Phenom II X4 955AMD $83Bench 51%, 41,403 samples	41x
Phenom II X6 1055TAMD $175Bench 54%, 23,835 samples	33x
Phenom II X4 965AMD $144Bench 53%, 43,442 samples	30x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	13x
HD 5770AMDBench 10%, 37,602 samples	12x
GTX 660Nvidia $170Bench 20%, 123,956 samples	9x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	7x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	5x
A400 120GBKingston $29Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	5x

RAM
2x4GBUnknownBench 39%, 424,126 samples	43x
4x4GBUnknownBench 43%, 106,178 samples	41x
12GBUnknownBench 35%, 85,415 samples	23x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 68% - Good

Total price: $222

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16