Asus PRIME X370-PRO

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asus PRIME X370-PRO (all builds)
Memory	11.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170330
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Aug 09 '17 at 01:53
Run Duration	120 Seconds
Run User	ARG-User
Background CPU	1%

PC Performing as expected (47^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 1700-$195 144,475 User benchmarks, average bench 69% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)	72.1% Very good	Memory 71 1-Core 95 2-Core 193 67% 120 Pts	4-Core 393 8-Core 734 67% 563 Pts	64-Core 1,025 64% 1,025 Pts
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 72.1% Great: 81%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SSD120G 120GB 79 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 3GB free Firmware: 20150818 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (29^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 475 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 929 (A0) Unknown 100 100 0 (A1) Unknown 100 100 123 (A2) Unknown 100 100 1 (A3) Unknown 100 100 22 (A4) Unknown 100 100 933718 (A5) Unknown 100 100 939 (A6) Unknown 100 100 888 (A7) Unknown 100 100 910 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 153 (C2) HDA temperature 100 100 40 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 84 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (F1) Unknown 100 100 26456 (F2) Unknown 100 100 42189 (F5) Unknown 100 100 2955229	43.5% Average	Read 312 Write 156 Mixed 207 50% 225 MB/s	4K Read 18.5 4K Write 53.6 4K Mixed 3.15 60% 25.1 MB/s	DQ Read 141 DQ Write 84.8 DQ Mixed 2.98 32% 76.2 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 43.5% Great: 89%
WD Purple 2TB (2014)-$67 19,126 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 86GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 177 170 4116 (04) Start/Stop count 96 96 4457 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 91 91 6947 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 2091 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 255 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 199 199 4201 (C2) HDA temperature 119 99 28 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 253 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0	46.9% Average	Read 83.9 Write 79.3 Mixed 80.6 61% 81.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.37 4K Write 1.72 4K Mixed 0.21 71% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 46.9% Great: 86%
Hitachi HUA722010CLA330 1TB-$38 10,195 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 59GB free (System drive) Firmware: JP4OA3EA Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing below expectations (28^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 136 136 95 (03) Spinup time 120 120 12905546045 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 6641 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 9 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 138 138 31 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 18829 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 6343 (C0) Power-off retract count 95 95 6649 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 95 95 6649 (C2) HDA temperature 181 181 244814053409 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 9 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 18687	53.5% Above average	Read 93.5 Write 93.2 Mixed 74.8 65% 87.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.16 4K Write 0.54 4K Mixed 0.22 41% 0.31 MB/s
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 53.5% Great: 76%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL F4-3200C DDR4 2x8GB 1,740 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 1200 MHz Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	84% Excellent	MC Read 33.5 MC Write 30 MC Mixed 28.9 88% 30.8 GB/s	SC Read 19.1 SC Write 29.9 SC Mixed 23.7 69% 24.2 GB/s	Latency 99 40% 99 ns
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 84% Great: 96%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical PRIME X370-PRO Builds (Compare 2,527 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 74%

Battleship

Desktop 75%

Battleship

Workstation 72%

Battleship

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X370-PRO - $109

CPU
Ryzen 7 1700AMD $195Bench 69%, 144,475 samples	417x
Ryzen 7 1700XAMD $225Bench 71%, 66,470 samples	326x
Ryzen 5 1600AMD $110Bench 70%, 392,253 samples	204x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	214x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	194x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	189x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	94x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	89x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GBSamsung $45Bench 199%, 240,629 samples	75x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	160x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	122x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $36Bench 84%, 287,720 samples	57x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $847

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Asus PRIME X370-PRO

Performance Results

PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X370-PRO - $109

Feedback

PC Performing as expected (47^th percentile)