Clevo W110ER

Performance Results


Gaming 6% Tree trunk	Desktop 59% Gunboat	Workstation 5% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	3.86% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	95.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.

CPU throttled at 99% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.

Run History

7 years ago, 6 years ago.

System	Clevo W110ER (all builds)
Motherboard	CLEVO W110ER
Memory	1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
OS	Windows 8.1
BIOS Date	20120525
Uptime	3 Days
Run Date	Aug 11 '17 at 04:34
Run Duration	90 Seconds
Run User	AUS-User
Background CPU	1%
CPU Throttled	99%

PC Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-3380M 2,989 User benchmarks, average bench 55% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 2.85 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)	58.3% Above average	Memory 84.6 1-Core 79.7 2-Core 142 62% 102 Pts	4-Core 190 8-Core 176 25% 183 Pts	64-Core 190 12% 190 Pts
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 58.3% Great: 64%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 650M 12,732 User benchmarks, average bench 6% Clevo(1558 1150) 2GB Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 22.21.13.8205 Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	3.86% Terrible	Lighting 5.27 Reflection 4.73 Parallax 2.62 4% 4.21 fps	MRender 5.1 Gravity 1.87 Splatting 4.09 3% 3.68 fps
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 3.86% Great: 7%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$130 154,399 User benchmarks, average bench 110% 557GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 2999 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 59 (B1) Unknown 99 99 1 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 54 45 46 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 23 (F1) Unknown 99 99 4749406161	95.9% Outstanding	Read 504 Write 396 Mixed 410 97% 437 MB/s	4K Read 31.3 4K Write 67.6 4K Mixed 42.3 137% 47.1 MB/s	DQ Read 221 DQ Write 161 DQ Mixed 85 92% 155 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 95.9% Great: 133%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Team Team-Elite-1600 1x8GB 3,120 User benchmarks, average bench 29% 1 of 4 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)	30.1% Below average	MC Read 10.3 MC Write 9.3 MC Mixed 8.7 27% 9.43 GB/s	SC Read 8.5 SC Write 10.7 SC Mixed 10.5 28% 9.9 GB/s	Latency 72.4 55% 72.4 ns
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 30.1% Great: 34%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical W110ER Builds (Compare 15 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 60%

Gunboat

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

System: Clevo W110ER

CPU
Core i7-3610QMIntel $300Bench 62%, 38,575 samples	5x
Core i7-3630QMIntel $420Bench 61%, 65,927 samples	4x
Core i7-3612QMIntelBench 60%, 11,760 samples	3x

GPU
GeForce GT 650MNvidiaBench 6%, 12,732 samples	8x
HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 409,110 samples	7x

SSD
520 Series 240GBIntel $139Bench 78%, 12,595 samples	2x
830 256GBSamsung $261Bench 72%, 25,763 samples	2x
M500 mSATA 240GBCrucial $120Bench 70%, 1,180 samples	2x

RAM
8JSF25664HZ-1G4D1 Kingston KHX1600C9S3K2/8GX 6GBMicronBench 39%, 2 samples	2x
Vengeance SODIM DDR3 1600 C10 1x8GBCorsairBench 29%, 626 samples	2x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 44% - Average

Total price: $439

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $33	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16