User System

Performance Results


Gaming 12% Tree trunk	Desktop 51% Yacht	Workstation 10% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 41.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	23.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	40% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (45%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	. .
Motherboard	http://www.abit.com.tw/ IP35 Pro(Intel P35-ICH9R)
Memory	5.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20080526
Uptime	0.9 Days
Run Date	Aug 12 '17 at 10:02
Run Duration	253 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	45%

PC Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 Quad Q6600-$100 59,658 User benchmarks, average bench 42% Socket 775, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (51^st percentile)	41.9% Average	Memory 65.9 1-Core 27.4 2-Core 55 34% 49.4 Pts	4-Core 106 8-Core 108 14% 107 Pts	64-Core 108 7% 108 Pts
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 41.9% Great: 50%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 660-Ti-$362 42,960 User benchmarks, average bench 26% EVGA(3842 3660) 2GB CLim: 1202 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 382.5 Performing below potential (23^rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	23.6% Poor	Lighting 28.2 Reflection 26.9 Parallax 33.9 23% 29.7 fps	MRender 35.2 Gravity 33.9 Splatting 23.8 25% 31 fps
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 23.6% Great: 29%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 110GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 97 97 13669 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 512 (B1) Unknown 97 97 46 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 75 61 25 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 35 (F1) Unknown 99 99 23488958968	40% Average	Read 189 Write 173 Mixed 162 39% 174 MB/s	4K Read 19.8 4K Write 28.4 4K Mixed 16.7 66% 21.7 MB/s	DQ Read 29.5 DQ Write 45.9 DQ Mixed 16.7 19% 30.7 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 40% Great: 124%
Seagate ST3750528AS 750GB-$65 22,230 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 496GB free Firmware: CC35 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing above expectations (64^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 118 99 185274288 (03) Spinup time 95 94 0 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 2000 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 54 54 4729069831796 (09) Power-on hours count 65 65 30959 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 387 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 99 8590065666 (BD) vendor-specific 99 99 1 (BE) vendor-specific 80 65 386793492 (C2) HDA temperature 20 40 17179869204 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 43 34 185274288 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 40037685163487 (F1) Unknown 100 253 1907503371 (F2) Unknown 100 253 1750805114	53% Above average	Read 89.4 Write 95 Mixed 91.9 70% 92.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.74 4K Write 1.44 4K Mixed 0.37 98% 0.85 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 53% Great: 65%
Seagate ST31000520AS 1TB-$250 11,608 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 380GB free Firmware: CC32 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 115 99 93758755 (03) Spinup time 96 95 0 (04) Start/Stop count 98 98 2445 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 10 (07) Seek error rate 86 60 439506993 (09) Power-on hours count 56 56 39025 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 635 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 99 4295032833 (BD) vendor-specific 98 98 2 (BE) vendor-specific 82 52 370016274 (C2) HDA temperature 18 48 17179869202 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 48 20 93758755 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 -111883898022423 (F1) Unknown 100 253 1679799508 (F2) Unknown 100 253 582330877	56.5% Above average	Read 108 Write 89.4 Mixed 73.8 67% 90.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.44 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.32 76% 0.65 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 56.5% Great: 62%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$36 203,102 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 376GB free Firmware: CC34 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing above expectations (69^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 116 99 114576210 (03) Spinup time 98 97 0 (04) Start/Stop count 96 96 4793 (05) Reallocated sector count 99 99 46 (07) Seek error rate 79 60 92832157 (09) Power-on hours count 82 82 15996 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 96 37 4793 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 99 8590131203 (BD) vendor-specific 93 93 7 (BE) vendor-specific 80 62 403636244 (C2) HDA temperature 20 40 21474836500 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 23 9 114576210 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 95760590859605 (F1) Unknown 100 253 616548158 (F2) Unknown 100 253 2509110935	60.9% Good	Read 111 Write 102 Mixed 68.4 70% 93.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.77 4K Write 1.71 4K Mixed 0.52 122% 1 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 60.9% Great: 70%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$36 203,102 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 361GB free Firmware: CC34 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing above expectations (75^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 115 99 100486829 (03) Spinup time 98 97 0 (04) Start/Stop count 95 95 5300 (05) Reallocated sector count 99 99 59 (07) Seek error rate 84 60 267452744 (09) Power-on hours count 74 74 23457 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 95 95 5301 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 99 8590065666 (BD) vendor-specific 99 99 1 (BE) vendor-specific 81 64 403570707 (C2) HDA temperature 19 40 8589934611 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 30 16 100486829 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 101803609854699 (F1) Unknown 100 253 268047261 (F2) Unknown 100 253 41224950	63.4% Good	Read 114 Write 107 Mixed 75.7 74% 98.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.52 4K Mixed 0.51 110% 0.88 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 63.4% Great: 70%
SanDisk Ultra 64GB 3,958 User benchmarks, average bench 23% 41GB free, PID 5590 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	36.8% Below average	Read 131 Write 42.1 Mixed 84.4 96% 85.7 MB/s	4K Read 4.95 4K Write 2.45 4K Mixed 1.21 143% 2.87 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 36.8% Great: 38%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 4x2GB 183,252 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 4 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM Performing below potential (23^rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	16.8% Very poor	MC Read 6.6 MC Write 4.5 MC Mixed 4.8 15% 5.3 GB/s	SC Read 4.3 SC Write 4 SC Mixed 5.3 13% 4.53 GB/s	Latency 112 36% 112 ns
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 16.8% Great: 45%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

User System

Performance Results

PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Feedback

PC Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)