Asrock H81M-GL

Performance Results


Gaming 23% Surfboard	Desktop 79% Battleship	Workstation 18% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	27.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	106% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

High background CPU (27%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asrock H81M-GL (all builds)
Memory	4.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20140702
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Aug 16 '17 at 14:49
Run Duration	547 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	27%

PC Performing as expected (58^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-4150-$42 36,627 User benchmarks, average bench 55% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	66.4% Good	Memory 89.4 1-Core 97.9 2-Core 185 73% 124 Pts	4-Core 257 8-Core 236 34% 247 Pts	64-Core 265 16% 265 Pts
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 66.4% Great: 68%

Graphics Cards	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10
Intel HD 4400 (Desktop 1.15 GHz) 64,721 User benchmarks, average bench 3% ASRock(1849 041E) 2GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 9.18.10.3186 Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	3.51% Terrible	Lighting 3.57 Reflection 5.46 Parallax 3.72 3% 4.25 fps	MRender 6.24 Gravity 2.37 Splatting 7.83 5% 5.48 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 3.51% Great: 3%
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Asus(1043 85C1) CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 384.94 Performing below potential (35^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	27.9% Poor	Lighting 35.1 Reflection 27.3 Parallax 33.3 29% 31.9 fps	MRender 33.3 Gravity 33.5 Splatting 31.2 27% 32.6 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 27.9% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 112GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (52^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 49 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 34 (B1) Unknown 100 100 0 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 63 54 37 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 3 (F1) Unknown 99 99 466916169	106% Outstanding	Read 500 Write 368 Mixed 394 93% 420 MB/s	4K Read 38.6 4K Write 99.7 4K Mixed 41.1 164% 59.8 MB/s	DQ Read 338 DQ Write 271 DQ Mixed 115 138% 241 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 106% Great: 124%
Seagate ST3500312CS 500GB-$24 89,637 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 197GB free Firmware: SS16 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 120 100 241676549 (03) Spinup time 98 97 0 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 638 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 66 60 4203564 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 80 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 150 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 71 59 488308765 (C2) HDA temperature 29 41 64424509469 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 54 50 241676549 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	57.6% Above average	Read 105 Write 95.9 Mixed 95.9 74% 98.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.57 4K Write 1.78 4K Mixed 0.52 115% 0.96 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 57.6% Great: 60%
Seagate BACKUP+ 500GB 44 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 161GB free, PID ab24 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)	17.7% Very poor	Read 37.8 Write 37.8 Mixed 37.6 49% 37.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.58 4K Write 1.25 4K Mixed 0.42 59% 0.75 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 17.7% Great: 45%
Seagate Expansion Desk 1TB 564 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 131GB free, PID 3320 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)	49% Average	Read 122 Write 107 Mixed 89.9 133% 106 MB/s	4K Read 0.84 4K Write 2.52 4K Mixed 0.38 102% 1.25 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 49% Great: 71%
ASMT 2105 750GB 5 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 127GB free, PID null Performing below expectations (20^th percentile)	10.8% Very poor	Read 38.1 Write 18.9 Mixed 5.66 22% 20.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.3 4K Write 0.34 4K Mixed 0.17 19% 0.27 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 10.8% Great: 49%
WDC WD20 EURX-63T0FY0 2TB 6 User benchmarks, average bench 18% 282GB free, PID 0c31 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)	17.9% Very poor	Read 34.4 Write 34.3 Mixed 34 44% 34.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.47 4K Write 1.74 4K Mixed 0.23 69% 0.81 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 17.9% Great: 20%
Seagate Expansion 1.5TB 135 User benchmarks, average bench 33% 111GB free, PID 231a Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Performing as expected (45^th percentile)	28.9% Poor	Read 37.8 Write 35.6 Mixed 3.54 29% 25.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.87 4K Write 5.03 4K Mixed 0.36 187% 2.09 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 28.9% Great: 53%
SAMSUNG HD103SI 1TB 377 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 78GB free, PID 2329 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	12% Very poor	Read 30.1 Write 17.5 Mixed 21.9 28% 23.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.38 4K Write 1.23 4K Mixed 0.22 51% 0.61 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 12% Great: 20%
ASMT 2105 750GB 11 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 41GB free, PID 1053 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)	14.8% Very poor	Read 38 Write 29 Mixed 15.5 32% 27.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.93 4K Write 0.9 4K Mixed 0.15 39% 0.66 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 14.8% Great: 39%
Seagate Expansion Desk 1TB 564 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 11GB free, PID 3320 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	73.6% Very good	Read 182 Write 188 Mixed 14.9 149% 128 MB/s	4K Read 0.91 4K Write 1.94 4K Mixed 0.24 77% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 73.6% Great: 71%
Mass Storage Device 160GB 951 User benchmarks, average bench 15% 7GB free, PID 6116 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	14.7% Very poor	Read 33.1 Write 31.9 Mixed 6.03 28% 23.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 0.93 4K Mixed 0.29 43% 0.54 MB/s
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 14.7% Great: 19%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair ValueSelect DDR3 1600 C11 2x4GB 2,884 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 2 of 2 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)	53.7% Above average	MC Read 18 MC Write 20.2 MC Mixed 17.1 53% 18.4 GB/s	SC Read 15.2 SC Write 17.3 SC Mixed 16.3 46% 16.3 GB/s	Latency 68 59% 68 ns
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 53.7% Great: 60%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H81M-GL Builds (Compare 80 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 64%

Destroyer

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock H81M-GL

CPU
Core i7-4790Intel $135Bench 71%, 255,027 samples	9x
Core i5-4460Intel $194Bench 62%, 245,403 samples	9x
Core i5-4570Intel $62Bench 62%, 129,272 samples	7x

GPU
HD Graphics (G4 Pentium/Celeron 1.05/1.15 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 43,454 samples	9x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	8x
GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples	6x

SSD
BX500 240GBCrucial $29Bench 56%, 142,801 samples	6x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	4x
S128G 126GBSandiskBench 42%, 21,984 samples	4x

RAM
99U5474-028.A00LF 99U5471-025.A00LF 8GBKingstonBench 44%, 30 samples	4x
M2X4G64CB8HG5N-DG 2x4GBNanyaBench 54%, 1,719 samples	3x
Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 78,181 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 75% - Very good

Total price: $164

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16