Powerspec Gseries

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 39%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 93%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics35.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive310% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago.
SystemPowerspec Gseries  (all builds)
MotherboardMSI Z270 PC MATE (MS-7A72)
Memory28.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20161202
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 23 '17 at 03:52
Run Duration238 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700K-$250
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
93% Outstanding
Memory 95.8
1-Core 143
2-Core 257
94% 165 Pts
4-Core 485
8-Core 796
78% 641 Pts
64-Core 790
49% 790 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 93%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198
CLim: 1493 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 384.94
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
35.9% Below average
Lighting 46.6
Reflection 46.3
Parallax 40.6
38% 44.5 fps
MRender 38.7
Gravity 41.6
Splatting 37.2
32% 39.1 fps
Poor: 30%
This bench: 35.9%
Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$249
865GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B6QCXP7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
310% Outstanding
Read 2,400
Write 1,855
Mixed 1,705
441% 1,987 MB/s
4K Read 51.7
4K Write 166
4K Mixed 68.9
254% 95.5 MB/s
DQ Read 486
DQ Write 526
DQ Mixed 166
219% 393 MB/s
Poor: 168%
This bench: 310%
Great: 363%
Crucial_CT2050MX300SSD1 2TB
813GB free
Firmware: M0CR031 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
80% Very good
Read 413
Write 342
Mixed 318
80% 358 MB/s
4K Read 27.5
4K Write 84.6
4K Mixed 28.1
122% 46.7 MB/s
DQ Read 28.2
DQ Write 227
DQ Mixed 23.1
49% 92.6 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 80%
Great: 99%
Samsung 840 Evo 750GB-$310
697GB free
Firmware: EXT0DB6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
73.2% Very good
Read 505
Write 113
Mixed 356
71% 325 MB/s
4K Read 45.5
4K Write 82
4K Mixed 26.8
147% 51.4 MB/s
DQ Read 46.4
DQ Write 86
DQ Mixed 38.6
37% 57 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 73.2%
Great: 125%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 2TB
1.5TB free, PID 0200
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
43.1% Average
Read 104
Write 105
Mixed 91.6
128% 100 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.65
4K Mixed 0.21
65% 0.79 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 43.1%
Great: 44%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 2TB
763GB free, PID a006
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
33.1% Below average
Read 78.1
Write 78
Mixed 65.5
94% 73.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.51
4K Write 1.52
4K Mixed 0.2
60% 0.75 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 33.1%
Great: 44%
Generic- Multiple Reader 256GB
163GB free, PID 6366
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
13.9% Very poor
Read 39.1
Write 22.9
Mixed 23.5
34% 28.5 MB/s
4K Read 4.82
4K Write 0.67
4K Mixed 0.56
60% 2.02 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 13.9%
Great: 24%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F4-3000C16-8GISB 029E CMR16GX4M2C3000C15 04CD F4-3000C16-8GISB 029E CMR16GX4M2C3000C15 32GB
3000, 3000, 3000, 3000 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
100% Outstanding
MC Read 37.2
MC Write 38.3
MC Mixed 30.4
101% 35.3 GB/s
SC Read 22.6
SC Write 43.6
SC Mixed 30.9
92% 32.4 GB/s
Latency 54.5
73% 54.5 ns
Poor: 75%
This bench: 100%
Great: 100%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Gseries Builds (Compare 245 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 62%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 49%
Yacht

System: Powerspec Gseries

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 127% - Outstanding Total price: $213
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $46
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback