Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 1% Tree trunk	Desktop 38% Jet ski	Workstation 1% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 47.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	0.76% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing as expected (47^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5450 442 User benchmarks, average bench 47% XU1 PROCESSOR, 2 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)	47.2% Average	Memory 62.6 1-Core 43.3 2-Core 86.7 40% 64.2 Pts	4-Core 173 8-Core 306 29% 239 Pts	64-Core 344 21% 344 Pts
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 47.2% Great: 49%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro NVS 290 1,528 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Nvidia(10DE 0492) 256MB Ram: 256MB, Driver: 341.44 Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)	0.76% Terrible	Lighting 0.83 Reflection 1.65 Parallax 0.38 1% 0.95 fps	MRender 1.71 Gravity 0.6 Splatting 1.13 1% 1.15 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.76% Great: 1%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Lsilogic Logical Volume 292GB 67 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 250GB free (System drive) Firmware: 3000 Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	61.2% Good	Read 141 Write 71.9 Mixed 92.4 76% 102 MB/s	4K Read 0.99 4K Write 0.71 4K Mixed 0.7 132% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 61.2% Great: 134%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 97GB 93 User benchmarks, average bench 26% null MHz 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 33792 MB Performing as expected (48^th percentile)	19.6% Very poor	MC Read 5.3 MC Write 5.8 MC Mixed 8.8 19% 6.63 GB/s	SC Read 3 SC Write 6.6 SC Mixed 4.3 13% 4.63 GB/s	Latency 120 33% 120 ns
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 19.6% Great: 63%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 45%

Yacht

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

CPU
CPU: Intel Xeon X54501stBench 47%, 826 samples	21x
CPU: Intel Xeon X54501stBench 47%, 324 samples	17x
Xeon X5450Intel $299Bench 50%, 5,870 samples	12x

GPU
GeForce GT 730NvidiaBench 5%, 164,888 samples	9x
Quadro FX 5600NvidiaBench 6%, 254 samples	9x
GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples	8x

SSD
870 QVO 2TBSamsung $149Bench 102%, 41,734 samples	9x
870 EVO 250G 250GBSamsungBench 92%, 167 samples	4x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	4x

Value: 46% - Average

Total price: $149

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16