Asus Z10PE-D16 Series

Performance Results


Gaming 6% Tree trunk	Desktop 45% Speed boat	Workstation 6% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (19th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 81 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 51.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	2.1% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	54.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago.

System	Asus Z10PE-D16 Series (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK Z10PE-D16 Series
Memory	29.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit couleurs, 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170111
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Sep 02 '17 at 23:01
Run Duration	90 Seconds
Run User	FRA-User
Background CPU	2%

PC Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel 185 User benchmarks, average bench 58% SOCKET 1, 2 CPU, 28 cores, 56 threads Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.35 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)	51.3% Above average	Memory 51.2 1-Core 64.8 2-Core 126 46% 80.6 Pts	4-Core 276 8-Core 551 49% 414 Pts	64-Core 1,643 102% 1,643 Pts
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 51.3% Great: 67%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro 400 1,018 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Nvidia(10DE 0893) 512MB Ram: 512MB, Driver: 341.35 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	2.1% Terrible	Lighting 2.73 Reflection 3.73 Parallax 1.12 2% 2.53 fps	MRender 3.19 Gravity 1.8 Splatting 1.96 2% 2.32 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 2.1% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial MX300 1TB-$130 21,936 User benchmarks, average bench 91% 453GB free (System drive) Firmware: M0CR040 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 390 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 170 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 100 100 1 (AE) Unknown 100 100 122 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 65 58 180390133795 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 100 100 0 (CE) Flying height 100 100 0 (F6) Unknown 100 100 1193258998 (F7) Unknown 100 100 37584411 (F8) Unknown 100 100 6081265 (B4) Unknown 0 0 4439 (D2) Unknown 100 100 0	54.9% Above average	Read 478 Write 332 Mixed 336 85% 382 MB/s	4K Read 15.1 4K Write 21.1 4K Mixed 11.7 49% 15.9 MB/s	DQ Read 13.6 DQ Write 17.2 DQ Mixed 6.96 8% 12.6 MB/s
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 54.9% Great: 105%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 18ASF1G72PDZ-2G1A1 4x8GB 131 User benchmarks, average bench 93% 4 of 16 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing way below expectations (0^th percentile)	46.1% Average	MC Read 19.7 MC Write 16.8 MC Mixed 17.4 51% 18 GB/s	SC Read 5 SC Write 9.5 SC Mixed 8.7 22% 7.73 GB/s	Latency 156 26% 156 ns
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 46.1% Great: 116%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Z10PE-D16 Series Builds (Compare 29 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 65%

Destroyer

Desktop 82%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 77%

Battleship

System: Asus Z10PE-D16 Series

CPU
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2667 v41stBench 78%, 304 samples	4x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2620 v41stBench 64%, 1,389 samples	4x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2630 v31stBench 64%, 1,710 samples	3x

GPU
GTX Titan XNvidia $615Bench 75%, 15,621 samples	4x
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	3x
RTX 3080-TiNvidia $660Bench 204%, 155,335 samples	3x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	4x
Raid 0 Volume 1TBIntelBench 264%, 11,317 samples	3x
850 Pro 256GBSamsung $115Bench 102%, 141,929 samples	2x

RAM
36ASF2G72PZ-2G1A2 4x16GBMicronBench 92%, 577 samples	5x
8x8GBUnknownBench 94%, 4,255 samples	3x
36ASF2G72PZ-2G1A2 8x16GBMicronBench 114%, 326 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 28% - Poor

Total price: $724

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $131	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16