Gigabyte GA-P55-USB3

Performance Results


Gaming 19% Surfboard	Desktop 75% Battleship	Workstation 15% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	21.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	52% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-P55-USB3 (all builds)
Memory	4.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.2 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20100812
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	Sep 09 '17 at 23:11
Run Duration	158 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	8%

PC Performing as expected (58^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5 760-$100 34,495 User benchmarks, average bench 64% Socket 1156, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.25 GHz Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	70.9% Very good	Memory 84.6 1-Core 86 2-Core 171 67% 114 Pts	4-Core 332 8-Core 329 44% 330 Pts	64-Core 335 21% 335 Pts
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 70.9% Great: 72%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD HD 6950-$290 24,657 User benchmarks, average bench 19% PwrHis(1787 2307) 1GB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1062.1004 Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	21.4% Poor	Lighting 27.4 Reflection 21.6 Parallax 24 22% 24.3 fps	MRender 21.6 Gravity 20.9 Splatting 27.7 20% 23.4 fps
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 21.4% Great: 21%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial M4 128GB-$116 34,516 User benchmarks, average bench 60% 14GB free (System drive) Firmware: 000F Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below potential (21^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 15175 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 3629 (AA) Unknown 100 100 0 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 94 94 184 (AE) Unknown 100 100 112 (B5) Unknown 100 100 14126206880077 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 80 (C2) HDA temperature 100 100 0 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 0 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 94 94 6 (CE) Flying height 100 100 0	52% Above average	Read 268 Write 182 Mixed 214 49% 221 MB/s	4K Read 26 4K Write 77.8 4K Mixed 6.64 89% 36.8 MB/s	DQ Read 135 DQ Write 109 DQ Mixed 5.55 36% 83.5 MB/s
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 52% Great: 72%
WD Blue 640GB (2008)-$33 94,563 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 92GB free Firmware: 01.0 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 159 155 5050 (04) Start/Stop count 88 88 12440 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 52 52 35179 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 96 96 4696 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 221 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 196 196 12347 (C2) HDA temperature 112 104 35 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	45.1% Average	Read 88.4 Write 68.4 Mixed 66.7 56% 74.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.46 4K Write 2.03 4K Mixed 0.35 95% 0.95 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 45.1% Great: 62%
Hitachi HDS5C3020ALA632 2TB-$270 9,828 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 19GB free Firmware: ML6O Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 133 133 104 (03) Spinup time 136 136 34386215313 (04) Start/Stop count 98 98 9775 (05) Reallocated sector count 1 1 2005 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 146 146 29 (09) Power-on hours count 97 97 23662 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 3776 (C0) Power-off retract count 92 92 9775 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 92 92 9775 (C2) HDA temperature 193 193 176094314527 (C4) Reallocation count 1 1 2785 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	37.2% Below average	Read 52.5 Write 77.5 Mixed 58.2 47% 62.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.42 4K Write 0.33 4K Mixed 0.26 53% 0.34 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 37.2% Great: 73%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 4x2GB 183,252 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 4 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	41.8% Average	MC Read 14.9 MC Write 14.2 MC Mixed 13.8 41% 14.3 GB/s	SC Read 10.8 SC Write 10.6 SC Mixed 13.1 33% 11.5 GB/s	Latency 72.4 55% 72.4 ns
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 41.8% Great: 45%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-P55-USB3 Builds (Compare 439 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 22%

Surfboard

Desktop 72%

Battleship

Workstation 18%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-P55-USB3

CPU
Core i5 760Intel $100Bench 64%, 34,495 samples	143x
Core i7 870Intel $100Bench 66%, 37,228 samples	86x
Core i5-750Intel $72Bench 62%, 43,796 samples	74x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	28x
GTX 1050Nvidia $101Bench 26%, 269,381 samples	21x
GTX 460Nvidia $203Bench 12%, 31,648 samples	18x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	14x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	12x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	12x

RAM
4x4GBUnknownBench 43%, 106,178 samples	95x
4x2GBUnknownBench 25%, 183,252 samples	68x
2x4GBUnknownBench 39%, 424,126 samples	58x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 70% - Very good

Total price: $253

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16