Asus Z87M-PLUS

Performance Results


Gaming 103% UFO	Desktop 87% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 80% Battleship


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	125% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	75.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus Z87M-PLUS (all builds)
Memory	11.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	Цвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20140102
Uptime	5.6 Days
Run Date	Sep 12 '17 at 18:15
Run Duration	153 Seconds
Run User	RUS-User
Background CPU	1%

PC Performing as expected (59^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-4670-$52 49,019 User benchmarks, average bench 66% SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	83.3% Excellent	Memory 93.2 1-Core 110 2-Core 217 80% 140 Pts	4-Core 424 8-Core 426 57% 425 Pts	64-Core 424 26% 424 Pts
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 83.3% Great: 77%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485 840,268 User benchmarks, average bench 124% Nvidia(10DE 120F) CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 385.41 Performing below potential (59^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	125% Outstanding	Lighting 172 Reflection 199 Parallax 178 140% 183 fps	MRender 127 Gravity 171 Splatting 124 114% 141 fps
Poor: 109% ↑ This bench: 125% Great: 133%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston HyperX 3K 120GB-$100 46,066 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 44GB free (System drive) Firmware: 521ABBF0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (50^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 95 95 59944312 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 72 72 33543694607090 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 572 (AB) Unknown 0 0 0 (AC) Unknown 0 0 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 77 (B1) Unknown 0 0 3 (B5) Unknown 0 0 0 (B6) Unknown 0 0 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 29 44 64427393053 (C2) HDA temperature 29 44 64427393053 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 120 120 59944312 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 120 120 59944312 (CC) Soft ECC correction 120 120 59944312 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 100 (E7) Temperature 93 93 1 (E9) Unknown 0 0 35799 (EA) Unknown 0 0 15900 (F1) Unknown 0 0 15900 (F2) Unknown 0 0 11019	75.2% Very good	Read 490 Write 203 Mixed 266 70% 320 MB/s	4K Read 29 4K Write 93.3 4K Mixed 20.7 120% 47.7 MB/s	DQ Read 177 DQ Write 189 DQ Mixed 54.5 76% 140 MB/s
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 75.2% Great: 87%
WD Red 3TB (2012)-$50 68,726 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 139GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 167 166 6633 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 305 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 68 68 23749 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 298 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 44 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 193 193 23121 (C2) HDA temperature 119 104 31 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 253 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0	46.9% Average	Read 79.3 Write 83.9 Mixed 84.9 62% 82.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.48 4K Write 1.64 4K Mixed 0.15 67% 0.76 MB/s
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 46.9% Great: 88%
Seagate ST3400320AS 400GB 155 User benchmarks, average bench 36% 68GB free Firmware: 3.AAM Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing as expected (41^st percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 253 0 (03) Spinup time 95 95 0 (04) Start/Stop count 88 88 12758 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 83 60 223802610 (09) Power-on hours count 31 31 60637 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 97 97 3561 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 61 39 706215975 (C2) HDA temperature 39 61 55834574887 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 51 45 17964252 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 100 253 0	35.3% Below average	Read 59.3 Write 63.5 Mixed 57.7 45% 60.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.55 4K Write 1.64 4K Mixed 0.27 83% 0.82 MB/s
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 35.3% Great: 46%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown CMX8GX3M2A1600C9 0215 CMX4GX3M1A1600C11 0215 CMX8GX3M2A1600C9 0215 CMX4GX3M1A1600C11 16GB 8 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	62.6% Good	MC Read 21.9 MC Write 23.1 MC Mixed 20.2 62% 21.7 GB/s	SC Read 16.3 SC Write 19.6 SC Mixed 19.1 52% 18.3 GB/s	Latency 61.6 65% 61.6 ns
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 62.6% Great: 63%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Z87M-PLUS Builds (Compare 672 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 42%

Speed boat

Desktop 77%

Battleship

Workstation 35%

Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus Z87M-PLUS - $138

CPU
Core i7-4770Intel $75Bench 70%, 176,321 samples	138x
Core i7-4770KIntel $120Bench 74%, 172,887 samples	112x
Core i5-4670KIntel $62Bench 68%, 128,482 samples	107x

GPU
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	47x
HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples	43x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	30x

SSD
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	36x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	26x
SSDNow V300 120GBKingston $37Bench 54%, 339,020 samples	19x

RAM
HyperX DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBKingstonBench 50%, 19,207 samples	14x
HyperX DDR3 1866 C10 4x4GBKingstonBench 60%, 17,012 samples	13x
Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 78,181 samples	12x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 96% - Outstanding

Total price: $367

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $46

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16