PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
Graphics | 17.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 103% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen. |
Motherboard | Asus P9D WS (all builds) |
Memory | 3.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 8.1 |
BIOS Date | 20140605 |
Uptime | 11.3 Days |
Run Date | Sep 15 '17 at 15:55 |
Run Duration | 109 Seconds |
Run User | GBR-User |
Background CPU | 57% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Xeon E3-1240 v3-$203
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
|
71%
Very good
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia Quadro K2200-$440
Nvidia(10DE 1097) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1124 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 347.52
|
17.2%
Very poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
103%
Outstanding
|
||||
101%
Outstanding
|
||||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Kingston 99U5584-005.A00LF 99U5584-003.A00LF 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
|
51.6%
Above average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i7-4790Intel $135Bench 71%, 255,027 samples | 7x |
Core i3-4130Intel $43Bench 52%, 49,509 samples | 7x |
Core i7-4790KIntel $348Bench 79%, 455,746 samples | 5x |
GPU | |
---|---|
HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples | 8x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 6x |
HD 4400 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 64,721 samples | 5x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 64% - Good | Total price: $230 |