| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
| Graphics | 49.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 73.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| Motherboard | Gigabyte GA-P64V7 (all builds) |
| Memory | 9.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz |
| Display | 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20161202 |
| Uptime | 0.1 Days |
| Run Date | Sep 17 '17 at 16:10 |
| Run Duration | 110 Seconds |
| Run User | DEU-User |
| Background CPU | 19% |
PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
|
55.8%
Above average
|
56% 96.2 Pts
|
38% 302 Pts
|
23% 366 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 1060 (Mobile)
Gigabyte(1458 3464) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 384.94
Performing below potential (77th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
49.2%
Average
|
47% 59.8 fps
|
53% 64.1 fps
| |
| Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Transcend MTS800 M.2 512GB-$265
268GB free (System drive)
Firmware: O0918B Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
|
73.3%
Very good
|
97% 437 MB/s
|
82% 31.2 MB/s
|
43% 86.9 MB/s
|
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Kingston CBD24D4S7D8MB-16 1x16GB
1 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
|
35.9%
Below average
|
36% 12.5 GB/s
|
30% 10.4 GB/s
|
37% 109 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical GA-P64V7 Builds (Compare 61 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-P64V7
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1060 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 47%, 177,775 samples | 37x |
| HD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 310,249 samples | 24x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 9% - Terrible | Total price: $265 |