| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
| Graphics | 6.38% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks. |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| Motherboard | Asrock 990FX Killer (all builds) |
| Memory | 4.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
| Display | 1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20141001 |
| Uptime | 0.1 Days |
| Run Date | Sep 18 '17 at 07:23 |
| Run Duration | 152 Seconds |
| Run User | THA-User |
| Background CPU | 100% |
PC Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
54.9%
Above average
|
56% 92.3 Pts
|
27% 257 Pts
|
16% 259 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 960-$198
Gigabyte(1458 36BD) 2GB
CLim: 1455 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 385.41
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
6.38%
Terrible
|
4% 6.61 fps
|
10% 12.4 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
WD Blue 2.5" 500GB (2009)-$50
313GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
|
30.1%
Below average
|
40% 52.9 MB/s
|
53% 0.42 MB/s
| |
|
Samsung S2 Portable 500GB
11GB free, PID 1f05
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
|
14.7%
Very poor
|
37% 28.8 MB/s
|
58% 0.68 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Kingston HyperX DDR3 1600 C10 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 800 MHz
|
41.5%
Average
|
43% 15 GB/s
|
20% 7.03 GB/s
|
60% 66.8 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical 990FX Killer Builds (Compare 257 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asrock 990FX Killer - $154
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples | 138x |
| FX-8320AMD $129Bench 59%, 106,454 samples | 29x |
| FX-6300AMD $57Bench 55%, 261,607 samples | 19x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples | 22x |
| GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 18x |
| GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples | 12x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 71% - Very good | Total price: $494 |