| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
| Graphics | 1.25% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
| System | HP Compaq 8200 Elite MT PC (all builds) |
| Motherboard | Hewlett-Packard 1495 |
| Memory | 1.3 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
| Display | 1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 7 |
| BIOS Date | 20111110 |
| Uptime | 2.1 Days |
| Run Date | Sep 19 '17 at 11:24 |
| Run Duration | 250 Seconds |
| Run User | KWT-User |
| Background CPU | 7% |
PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
68.5%
Good
|
68% 117 Pts
|
48% 386 Pts
|
28% 451 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Intel HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)
HP(103C 1495) 1.5GB
Driver: igdumd32.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4229
|
1.25%
Terrible
|
1% 1.44 fps
|
2% 1.83 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$23
94GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HP73 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
|
64.1%
Good
|
79% 106 MB/s
|
176% 2.43 MB/s
| |
|
WD My Passport Essential 320GB
13GB free, PID 070a
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
|
5.22%
Terrible
|
12% 10.1 MB/s
|
7% 0.14 MB/s
| |
|
WD Elements 500GB
3GB free, PID 1023
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
|
11.8%
Very poor
|
22% 18.8 MB/s
|
51% 0.59 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Micron 16JTF51264AZ-1G6M1 1x4GB
1 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (33rd percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
26.1%
Poor
|
23% 8.2 GB/s
|
24% 8.53 GB/s
|
47% 84.6 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical Compaq 8200 Elite MT PC Builds (Compare 285 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
System: HP Compaq 8200 Elite MT PC
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i5-2400Intel $250Bench 61%, 166,255 samples | 135x |
| Core i7-2600Intel $197Bench 67%, 185,630 samples | 93x |
| Core i5-2500IntelBench 63%, 82,538 samples | 38x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples | 57x |
| GTX 1050Nvidia $101Bench 26%, 269,381 samples | 25x |
| GeForce GT 730NvidiaBench 5%, 164,888 samples | 25x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 55% - Above average | Total price: $292 |