Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming 5

Performance Results


Gaming 36% Jet ski	Desktop 90% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 37% Jet ski


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	32.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	196% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming 5 (all builds)
Memory	13 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170526
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Sep 19 '17 at 17:01
Run Duration	203 Seconds
Run User	THA-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing as expected (56^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 1700-$195 144,475 User benchmarks, average bench 69% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	85.8% Excellent	Memory 79.8 1-Core 123 2-Core 246 82% 150 Pts	4-Core 492 8-Core 933 85% 712 Pts	64-Core 1,348 83% 1,348 Pts
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 85.8% Great: 81%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198 440,282 User benchmarks, average bench 33% Zotac(19DA 2375) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1531 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 385.41 Performing below potential (46^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	32.3% Below average	Lighting 42.1 Reflection 39.9 Parallax 35.4 34% 39.1 fps	MRender 34 Gravity 36.7 Splatting 33.4 28% 34.7 fps
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 32.3% Great: 36%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 950 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB-$250 40,327 User benchmarks, average bench 199% 162GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1B0QBXX7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Performing as expected (41^st percentile)	196% Outstanding	Read 2,004 Write 919 Mixed 1,132 297% 1,351 MB/s	4K Read 45.4 4K Write 122 4K Mixed 28.1 169% 65 MB/s	DQ Read 218 DQ Write 249 DQ Mixed 66.5 96% 178 MB/s
Poor: 131% ↑ This bench: 196% Great: 243%
Kingston HyperX 3K 120GB-$100 46,066 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 54GB free Firmware: 521ABBF0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 95 95 4797684 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 88 88 -129484674028522 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1232 (AB) Unknown 0 0 0 (AC) Unknown 0 0 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 774 (B1) Unknown 0 0 1 (B5) Unknown 0 0 0 (B6) Unknown 0 0 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 36 46 107377197092 (C2) HDA temperature 36 46 107377197092 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 120 120 4797684 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 120 120 4797684 (CC) Soft ECC correction 120 120 4797684 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 100 (E7) Temperature 100 100 0 (E9) Unknown 0 0 2923 (EA) Unknown 0 0 1597 (F1) Unknown 0 0 1597 (F2) Unknown 0 0 2083	77.6% Very good	Read 503 Write 190 Mixed 241 68% 311 MB/s	4K Read 33.4 4K Write 92.4 4K Mixed 21.8 128% 49.2 MB/s	DQ Read 196 DQ Write 191 DQ Mixed 53.6 79% 147 MB/s
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 77.6% Great: 87%
HyperX Savage 120GB-$80 7,194 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 34GB free Firmware: SAFM00.U Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (61^st percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 5462 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 230 (A8) Unknown 100 100 0 (AA) Unknown 100 100 246 (AD) Unknown 100 100 1245244 (AF) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 57 (C2) HDA temperature 61 51 210454904871 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (DA) Unknown 100 100 0 (E7) Temperature 100 100 100 (E9) Unknown 100 100 2489 (F0) Head flying hours 100 100 0 (F1) Unknown 100 100 2183 (F2) Unknown 100 100 1448 (F4) Unknown 100 100 19 (F5) Unknown 100 100 60 (F6) Unknown 100 100 669056	90.2% Outstanding	Read 523 Write 425 Mixed 461 105% 470 MB/s	4K Read 28.9 4K Write 81.6 4K Mixed 13.8 105% 41.4 MB/s	DQ Read 300 DQ Write 303 DQ Mixed 13.5 89% 205 MB/s
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 90.2% Great: 104%
WD Green 1TB (2009)-$65 103,919 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 682GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing as expected (44^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 130 115 6491 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 1106 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 97 97 2852 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 795 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 351 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 155 155 137704 (C2) HDA temperature 106 90 41 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	39.8% Below average	Read 68.8 Write 69.9 Mixed 68.5 52% 69.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.45 4K Write 0.36 4K Mixed 0.22 50% 0.34 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 39.8% Great: 57%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$35 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 699GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 177 174 2141 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 1732 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 93 93 5570 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1176 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 712 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 200 200 1019 (C2) HDA temperature 101 90 42 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	55.7% Above average	Read 96 Write 97.5 Mixed 88.6 71% 94 MB/s	4K Read 1.14 4K Write 2.25 4K Mixed 0.25 117% 1.21 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 55.7% Great: 109%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL Trident Z RGB DDR4 3000 C16 2x8GB-$56 84,291 User benchmarks, average bench 81% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2933 MHz Performing above expectations (85^th percentile)	94.5% Outstanding	MC Read 39.6 MC Write 32.4 MC Mixed 30.4 98% 34.1 GB/s	SC Read 23.1 SC Write 38 SC Mixed 26.2 83% 29.1 GB/s	Latency 81 49% 81 ns
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 94.5% Great: 101%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-AX370-Gaming 5 Builds (Compare 678 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 90%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 80%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 87%

Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming 5 - $246

CPU
Ryzen 7 1700AMD $195Bench 69%, 144,475 samples	100x
Ryzen 7 1700XAMD $225Bench 71%, 66,470 samples	88x
Ryzen 7 1800XAMD $60Bench 72%, 30,050 samples	75x

GPU
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	70x
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	52x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	49x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $76Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	27x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	23x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	17x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	37x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	23x
Flare X DDR4 3200 C14 2x8GBG.SKILL $73Bench 98%, 54,616 samples	13x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 77% - Very good

Total price: $1,042

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming 5

Performance Results

PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming 5 - $246

Feedback

PC Performing as expected (56^th percentile)