Performance Results


Gaming 37% Jet ski	Desktop 80% Battleship	Workstation 32% Sail boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	47.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	32.4% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-4770-$75 176,321 User benchmarks, average bench 70% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	75.6% Very good	Memory 82.6 1-Core 114 2-Core 216 78% 137 Pts	4-Core 370 8-Core 577 58% 474 Pts	64-Core 580 36% 580 Pts
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 75.6% Great: 78%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 780-Ti-$410 30,815 User benchmarks, average bench 53% EVGA(3842 2881) 3GB CLim: 1202 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 385.69 Performing below potential (9^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	47.1% Average	Lighting 58.9 Reflection 56.1 Parallax 69.2 48% 61.4 fps	MRender 68.3 Gravity 61.1 Splatting 42.2 45% 57.2 fps
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 47.1% Great: 59%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung PM810 2.5" 7mm 128GB 4,365 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 62GB free (System drive) Firmware: AXM76D1Q Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 99 99 4 (09) Power-on hours count 97 97 13594 (0C) Power cycle count 97 97 2151 (AF) Unknown 99 99 4 (B0) Unknown 100 100 0 (B1) Unknown 87 87 393 (B2) Unknown 70 70 600 (B3) Unknown 73 73 1088 (B4) Unknown 73 73 2944 (B5) Unknown 99 99 4 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 99 99 4 (BB) vendor-specific 82 82 18130 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 1 1 18130 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 253 253 0 (E8) Unknown 70 70 1416 (F1) Unknown 10 10 3880774116 (F2) Unknown 3 3 4178087841	32.4% Below average	Read 239 Write 237 Mixed 78.8 41% 185 MB/s	4K Read 2.03 4K Write 22.4 4K Mixed 6.95 24% 10.4 MB/s	DQ Read 13.5 DQ Write 28.1 DQ Mixed 8.2 10% 16.6 MB/s
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 32.4% Great: 50%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 16GB 60,539 User benchmarks, average bench 11% 11GB free, PID 5567 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)	7.98% Terrible	Read 21.7 Write 5.05 Mixed 6.29 11% 11 MB/s	4K Read 4.23 4K Write 0.89 4K Mixed 1.38 93% 2.17 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 7.98% Great: 17%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown CM3X2G1333C9 0215 CMZ8GX3M2A1600C9 1317 OCZ3P1333LV2G 0215 CMZ8GX3M2A1600C9 12GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 1066, 1066, 1066, 1066 MHz 2048, 4096, 2048, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	41.9% Average	MC Read 14.2 MC Write 14.8 MC Mixed 12.7 40% 13.9 GB/s	SC Read 12.3 SC Write 15.6 SC Mixed 13.7 40% 13.9 GB/s	Latency 75.9 53% 75.9 ns
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 41.9% Great: 42%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 39%

Jet ski

Desktop 78%

Battleship

Workstation 32%

Sail boat

GPU
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	166x
HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples	147x
GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples	85x

RAM
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 54%, 77,652 samples	76x
BLS8G3D1609DS1S00. 2x8GBCrucialBench 55%, 48,796 samples	44x
Ballistix Sport DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBCrucialBench 56%, 44,086 samples	35x

Value: 58% - Above average

Total price: $444

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16