Asus H110M-PLUS

Performance Results


Gaming 13% Tree trunk	Desktop 81% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 10% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (80th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 20 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	32.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	103% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (91%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus H110M-PLUS (all builds)
Memory	1.9 GB free of 4 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170316
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Sep 25 '17 at 18:46
Run Duration	262 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	91%

PC Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Pentium G4560-$31 70,054 User benchmarks, average bench 57% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	72.7% Very good	Memory 92.5 1-Core 105 2-Core 180 75% 126 Pts	4-Core 308 8-Core 309 41% 308 Pts	64-Core 303 19% 303 Pts
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 72.7% Great: 68%

Graphics Cards	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10
Intel HD 610 (Desktop Kaby Lake) 14,881 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Asus(1043 8694) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64 Ver. 22.20.16.4771 Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	3.95% Terrible	Lighting 3.73 Reflection 5.46 Parallax 3.62 3% 4.27 fps	MRender 6.71 Gravity 3.43 Splatting 9.74 6% 6.63 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 3.95% Great: 3%
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% MSI(1462 8C96) CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 384.94 Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	32.2% Below average	Lighting 40.7 Reflection 31.6 Parallax 38 33% 36.8 fps	MRender 38.3 Gravity 38.1 Splatting 35.5 30% 37.3 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 32.2% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 201GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (44^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 83 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 88 (B1) Unknown 99 99 1 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 65 54 35 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 12 (F1) Unknown 99 99 1131288527	103% Outstanding	Read 494 Write 388 Mixed 408 96% 430 MB/s	4K Read 32.2 4K Write 83.1 4K Mixed 44.4 150% 53.2 MB/s	DQ Read 342 DQ Write 247 DQ Mixed 119 136% 236 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 103% Great: 124%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$35 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 717GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (71^st percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 173 172 2316 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 132 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 82 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 253 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 87 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 17 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 200 200 240 (C2) HDA temperature 105 103 38 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 253 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0	93.8% Outstanding	Read 168 Write 159 Mixed 150 119% 159 MB/s	4K Read 1.23 4K Write 2.38 4K Mixed 0.37 137% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 93.8% Great: 109%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB 9,009 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 767GB free, PID a006 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	40.6% Average	Read 101 Write 101 Mixed 59.6 108% 87.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.49 4K Write 1.25 4K Mixed 0.2 51% 0.65 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 40.6% Great: 43%
Generic Flash Disk 1GB 2,763 User benchmarks, average bench 4% 1GB free, PID 6387 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	7.04% Terrible	Read 22.3 Write 10.5 Mixed 12.2 17% 15 MB/s	4K Read 5.64 4K Write 0.06 4K Mixed 0.05 25% 1.92 MB/s
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 7.04% Great: 7%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial BLS4G4D240FSB.8FBD 1x4GB 908 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 1 of 2 slots used 4GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)	41.6% Average	MC Read 15.1 MC Write 15.6 MC Mixed 11.5 40% 14.1 GB/s	SC Read 10.9 SC Write 10.3 SC Mixed 11.3 31% 10.8 GB/s	Latency 63.1 63% 63.1 ns
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 41.6% Great: 48%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H110M-PLUS Builds (Compare 621 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 47%

Yacht

Desktop 82%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 40%

Speed boat

Motherboard: Asus H110M-PLUS

CPU
Core i7-7700Intel $167Bench 76%, 256,717 samples	147x
Core i5-7500Intel $89Bench 67%, 149,467 samples	130x
Core i5-6500Intel $67Bench 64%, 241,476 samples	97x

GPU
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	120x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	86x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	55x

SSD
Ultimate SU800 256GBAdata $54Bench 91%, 40,725 samples	33x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	25x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	21x

RAM
Value DDR4 2133 C15 2x8GBG.SKILLBench 68%, 7,794 samples	79x
ValueSelect DDR4 2133 C15 2x8GBCorsairBench 68%, 7,803 samples	32x
ValueSelect DDR4 2133 C15 1x16GBCorsairBench 39%, 1,735 samples	27x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 86% - Excellent

Total price: $337

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16