Asrock Z77 Extreme4

Performance Results


Gaming 56% Gunboat	Desktop 77% Battleship	Workstation 46% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	76.6% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	61.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago.

Motherboard	Asrock Z77 Extreme4 (all builds)
Memory	11.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit cores, 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit cores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20130711
Uptime	22.5 Days
Run Date	Sep 26 '17 at 03:52
Run Duration	183 Seconds
Run User	BRA-User
Background CPU	10%

PC Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-3770K-$175 165,979 User benchmarks, average bench 72% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)	70.2% Very good	Memory 81.2 1-Core 103 2-Core 190 72% 125 Pts	4-Core 322 8-Core 446 48% 384 Pts	64-Core 501 31% 501 Pts
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 70.2% Great: 83%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-Ti-$560 214,030 User benchmarks, average bench 79% Nvidia(10DE 1151) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1392 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 382.33 Performing below potential (43^rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	76.6% Very good	Lighting 98.9 Reflection 101 Parallax 91.1 81% 97.1 fps	MRender 86.2 Gravity 89.2 Splatting 78.3 69% 84.6 fps
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 76.6% Great: 87%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Corsair Force GT 120GB-$155 13,464 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 34GB free (System drive) Firmware: 5.05 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (28^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 107 107 16235360 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 85 85 50611894629437 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 165 (AB) Unknown 0 0 0 (AC) Unknown 0 0 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 110 (B1) Unknown 0 0 6 (B5) Unknown 0 0 0 (B6) Unknown 0 0 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 33 57 77313146913 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 120 120 16235360 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 120 120 16235360 (CC) Soft ECC correction 120 120 16235360 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 100 (E7) Temperature 100 100 0 (E9) Unknown 0 0 9168 (EA) Unknown 0 0 7351 (F1) Unknown 0 0 7351 (F2) Unknown 0 0 11814	61.9% Good	Read 485 Write 137 Mixed 206 60% 276 MB/s	4K Read 26.7 4K Write 60.2 4K Mixed 15.2 92% 34 MB/s	DQ Read 182 DQ Write 150 DQ Mixed 39.5 64% 124 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 61.9% Great: 83%
WD Red 4TB (2013)-$110 55,507 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 1TB free Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value	51.8% Above average	Read 97.2 Write 83.2 Mixed 82 66% 87.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.46 4K Write 1.96 4K Mixed 0.18 75% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 51.8% Great: 100%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.11 1.5TB-$88 40,945 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 412GB free Firmware: CC1H Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value	38.6% Below average	Read 62.5 Write 71.8 Mixed 75.2 53% 69.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.35 4K Write 1.17 4K Mixed 0.36 76% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 38.6% Great: 70%
Seagate ST33000651AS 3TB-$229 5,029 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 219GB free Firmware: CC44 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 120 99 235008462 (03) Spinup time 89 89 0 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 1833 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 73 60 12945461856 (09) Power-on hours count 86 86 12424 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1487 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 98 107375820825 (BD) vendor-specific 94 94 6 (BE) vendor-specific 61 45 656670759 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 121 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 99 99 2205 (C2) HDA temperature 39 55 81604378663 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 24 5 235008462 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 25129853661185 (F1) Unknown 100 253 651845523 (F2) Unknown 100 253 3961289312	54% Above average	Read 90.1 Write 98 Mixed 93.3 71% 93.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.24 4K Write 1.53 4K Mixed 0.19 60% 0.65 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 54% Great: 86%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
HyperX Savage DDR3 2400 C11 2x8GB 20,216 User benchmarks, average bench 63% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing below potential (34^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	54.2% Above average	MC Read 20.7 MC Write 18.5 MC Mixed 17.1 54% 18.8 GB/s	SC Read 16.4 SC Write 17.3 SC Mixed 17.3 49% 17 GB/s	Latency 78.3 51% 78.3 ns
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 54.2% Great: 86%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Z77 Extreme4 Builds (Compare 4,006 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 37%

Jet ski

Desktop 77%

Battleship

Workstation 29%

Raft

Motherboard: Asrock Z77 Extreme4 - $165

CPU
Core i5-3570KIntel $136Bench 68%, 185,516 samples	1,522x
Core i7-3770KIntel $175Bench 72%, 165,979 samples	949x
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	557x

GPU
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	310x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	269x
HD 4000 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 52,547 samples	237x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	173x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	140x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	107x

RAM
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	90x
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBCorsairBench 54%, 43,127 samples	86x
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBCorsairBench 48%, 73,650 samples	81x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 60% - Good

Total price: $581

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16