Asus Crosshair V Formula

Performance Results


Gaming 42% Speed boat	Desktop 70% Battleship	Workstation 34% Sail boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	63% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	51.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Motherboard	Asus Crosshair V Formula (all builds)
Memory	12.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20121017
Uptime	0.7 Days
Run Date	Sep 26 '17 at 12:52
Run Duration	201 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	2%

Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (49^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-8150-$770 22,181 User benchmarks, average bench 59% Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	63.2% Good	Memory 82.6 1-Core 72.3 2-Core 140 60% 98.2 Pts	4-Core 238 8-Core 394 38% 316 Pts	64-Core 393 24% 393 Pts
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 63.2% Great: 66%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132 1,459,281 User benchmarks, average bench 80% Device(0000 0000) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 385.41 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	63% Good	Lighting 69.1 Reflection 102 Parallax 97.7 56% 89.5 fps	MRender 80.7 Gravity 95.6 Splatting 98.5 76% 91.6 fps
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 63% Great: 88%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$109 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 49GB free Firmware: EMT01B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 96 96 15949 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 615 (B1) Unknown 99 99 2 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 70 60 30 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 7 (F1) Unknown 99 99 2989738965	81.4% Excellent	Read 486 Write 372 Mixed 243 81% 367 MB/s	4K Read 29 4K Write 43.3 4K Mixed 32.3 108% 34.8 MB/s	DQ Read 140 DQ Write 112 DQ Mixed 56.7 61% 103 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 81.4% Great: 134%
Corsair Force GT 120GB-$155 13,464 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 8GB free (System drive) Firmware: 5.06 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 110 110 43531294 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 66 66 -37787122240334 (0C) Power cycle count 89 89 11309 (AB) Unknown 0 0 0 (AC) Unknown 0 0 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 796 (B1) Unknown 0 0 7 (B5) Unknown 0 0 0 (B6) Unknown 0 0 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 30 43 38657523742 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 120 120 43531294 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 120 120 43531294 (CC) Soft ECC correction 120 120 43531294 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 100 (E7) Temperature 94 94 0 (E9) Unknown 0 0 34251 (EA) Unknown 0 0 13140 (F1) Unknown 0 0 13140 (F2) Unknown 0 0 5573	51.4% Above average	Read 357 Write 121 Mixed 175 48% 218 MB/s	4K Read 21.1 4K Write 46 4K Mixed 16 77% 27.7 MB/s	DQ Read 169 DQ Write 137 DQ Mixed 43.3 62% 116 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 51.4% Great: 83%
WD Blue 2TB (2015)-$78 253,816 User benchmarks, average bench 65% 1TB free Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (51^st percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 177 176 4141 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 169 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 2122 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 253 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 9 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 0 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 200 200 1126 (C2) HDA temperature 120 112 27 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	65.9% Good	Read 113 Write 117 Mixed 98.5 82% 109 MB/s	4K Read 0.64 4K Write 2.26 4K Mixed 0.27 99% 1.06 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 65.9% Great: 84%
WD WD5000AVDS-63U7B1 500GB 24,608 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 451GB free Firmware: 01.0 Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	52.6% Above average	Read 96.6 Write 86.6 Mixed 85 67% 89.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.38 4K Write 1.89 4K Mixed 0.31 85% 0.86 MB/s
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 52.6% Great: 52%
Hitachi HDS721010CLA330 1TB 8,831 User benchmarks, average bench 60% 49GB free Firmware: JP4OA3MA Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 136 136 95 (03) Spinup time 123 123 25790054706 (04) Start/Stop count 97 97 12998 (05) Reallocated sector count 77 77 574 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 138 138 31 (09) Power-on hours count 96 96 31855 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 11362 (C0) Power-off retract count 89 89 13244 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 89 89 13244 (C2) HDA temperature 200 200 188979413022 (C4) Reallocation count 76 76 624 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 11 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 1	45.7% Average	Read 75.9 Write 83.4 Mixed 14.1 42% 57.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.56 4K Write 1.21 4K Mixed 0.29 78% 0.69 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 45.7% Great: 76%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 16GB 70,565 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB Performing above expectations (79^th percentile)	45.6% Average	MC Read 18 MC Write 15.4 MC Mixed 15.5 47% 16.3 GB/s	SC Read 9 SC Write 9.9 SC Mixed 12.3 30% 10.4 GB/s	Latency 75.9 53% 75.9 ns
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 45.6% Great: 54%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Crosshair V Formula Builds (Compare 273 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 32%

Sail boat

Desktop 68%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 26%

Raft

Motherboard: Asus Crosshair V Formula - $220

CPU
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples	82x
FX-8150AMD $770Bench 59%, 22,181 samples	53x
FX-8120AMDBench 56%, 25,690 samples	29x

GPU
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	20x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	15x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	13x

SSD
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $129Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	12x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	11x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	9x

RAM
16GBUnknownBench 41%, 70,565 samples	170x
8GBUnknownBench 34%, 82,857 samples	35x
32GBUnknownBench 53%, 5,781 samples	31x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 56% - Above average

Total price: $679

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16