Asrock 970 Pro3 R2.0

Performance Results


Gaming 29% Raft	Desktop 68% Battle cruiser	Workstation 23% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	43.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	37% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Motherboard	Asrock 970 Pro3 R2.0 (all builds)
Memory	12.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display	1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20130731
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Sep 27 '17 at 14:36
Run Duration	200 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	3%

Watch Gameplay: 480 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (54^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-6300-$47 261,607 User benchmarks, average bench 55% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 6 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	62.2% Good	Memory 83.6 1-Core 64.4 2-Core 131 57% 93 Pts	4-Core 226 8-Core 303 34% 264 Pts	64-Core 303 19% 303 Pts
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 62.2% Great: 62%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 480-$75 261,163 User benchmarks, average bench 46% PowerColor(148C 2372) Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 22.19.662.4 Performing below potential (34^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	43.1% Average	Lighting 50.6 Reflection 66.2 Parallax 76.9 41% 64.6 fps	MRender 67.1 Gravity 50.7 Splatting 55 47% 57.6 fps
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 43.1% Great: 53%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
OCZ Trion 100 240GB-$95 9,561 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 62GB free (System drive) Firmware: SAFM11.2 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 5031 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 796 (A7) Unknown 100 100 0 (A8) Unknown 100 100 2 (A9) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 195 195 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 20 (C2) HDA temperature 68 54 197569413152	37% Below average	Read 322 Write 99 Mixed 131 40% 184 MB/s	4K Read 23.1 4K Write 31.9 4K Mixed 5.45 59% 20.1 MB/s	DQ Read 26 DQ Write 46.4 DQ Mixed 7.75 14% 26.7 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 37% Great: 83%
Seagate ST1500DM003-9YN16G 1.5TB 5,186 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 999GB free Firmware: CC4B Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (77^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 116 99 113518560 (03) Spinup time 94 94 0 (04) Start/Stop count 98 98 2583 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 82 60 4488658816 (09) Power-on hours count 88 88 11242 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1770 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 96 4295360561 (BD) vendor-specific 98 98 2 (BE) vendor-specific 69 55 4816568351 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 63 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 74 74 52173 (C2) HDA temperature 31 45 -140737488355297 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 12 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 1443109020812 (F1) Unknown 100 253 22309827194783 (F2) Unknown 100 253 59937602193804	89.8% Excellent	Read 154 Write 159 Mixed 79.3 97% 131 MB/s	4K Read 0.81 4K Write 1.22 4K Mixed 0.39 100% 0.81 MB/s
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 89.8% Great: 103%
Samsung HD502IJ 500GB-$40 25,285 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 386GB free Firmware: 1AA01112 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing as expected (45^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 86 86 5120 (04) Start/Stop count 92 92 8148 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 95 95 23878 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 95 95 4990 (0D) Soft read error rate 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 1 1 4422 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 82 55 302972946 (C2) HDA temperature 76 54 403636248 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 2722 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 99 92 1260 (C8) Write error rate 100 99 5 (C9) Soft read error rate 253 253 0	41.4% Average	Read 68 Write 75.6 Mixed 52.1 49% 65.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.67 4K Write 2.42 4K Mixed 0.49 128% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 41.4% Great: 59%
WD Black 1TB (2013)-$48 240,965 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 87GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (68^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 168 166 2558 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 325 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 766 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 182 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 4 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 200 200 950 (C2) HDA temperature 113 99 30 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 253 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0	91.4% Outstanding	Read 155 Write 163 Mixed 107 106% 142 MB/s	4K Read 0.79 4K Write 2.38 4K Mixed 0.35 116% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 91.4% Great: 108%
Hitachi HDS721010CLA330 1TB 8,831 User benchmarks, average bench 60% 83GB free Firmware: JP4OA3MA Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing as expected (60^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 136 136 93 (03) Spinup time 123 123 25789989173 (04) Start/Stop count 98 98 8988 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 140 140 30 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 14702 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 2239 (C0) Power-off retract count 93 93 9051 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 93 93 9051 (C2) HDA temperature 187 187 231928889376 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	64.3% Good	Read 116 Write 108 Mixed 33.1 63% 85.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.49 4K Write 1.24 4K Mixed 0.32 79% 0.68 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 64.3% Great: 76%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 9965525-033.A00LF Corsair CMX4GX3M1A1333C9 9965525-033.A00LF Corsair CMX4GX3M1A1333C9 16GB 667, 667, 667, 667 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	39.5% Below average	MC Read 15 MC Write 13.3 MC Mixed 13.1 39% 13.8 GB/s	SC Read 9.1 SC Write 8.2 SC Mixed 10.3 26% 9.2 GB/s	Latency 74.1 54% 74.1 ns

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical 970 Pro3 R2.0 Builds (Compare 787 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 21%

Surfboard

Desktop 65%

Destroyer

Workstation 17%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock 970 Pro3 R2.0 - $18

CPU
FX-6300AMD $47Bench 55%, 261,607 samples	193x
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples	191x
FX-8320AMD $129Bench 59%, 106,454 samples	102x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	63x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	53x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	33x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	40x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	26x
SSDNow V300 120GBKingston $37Bench 54%, 339,020 samples	17x

RAM
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	27x
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 54%, 77,652 samples	16x
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x4GBHyperX $35Bench 51%, 38,490 samples	12x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 88% - Excellent

Total price: $152

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $46

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16