| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way above expectations (94th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 6 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master! |
| Processor | With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good. |
| Graphics | 23.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Memory | 64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| Motherboard | Asus X99-E WS/USB 3.1 (all builds) |
| Memory | 59.7 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz |
| Display | 1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 7 |
| BIOS Date | 20161114 |
| Uptime | 0.1 Days |
| Run Date | Oct 01 '17 at 21:40 |
| Run Duration | 159 Seconds |
| Run User | USA-User |
| Background CPU | 13% |
PC Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
89.8%
Excellent
|
84% 149 Pts
|
76% 618 Pts
|
54% 876 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 384.94
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
23.6%
Poor
|
22% 26.9 fps
|
27% 32.5 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
||||
|
|
||||
|
|
373%
Outstanding
|
485% 2,192 MB/s
|
343% 142 MB/s
|
454% 804 MB/s
|
|
|
93.2%
Outstanding
|
80% 111 MB/s
|
116% 1.21 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 2400 C15 4x16GB
4 of 8 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
|
112%
Outstanding
|
126% 44 GB/s
|
52% 18.1 GB/s
|
60% 66.8 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical X99-E WS/USB 3.1 Builds (Compare 261 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus X99-E WS/USB 3.1
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i7-5960XIntel $285Bench 80%, 15,468 samples | 38x |
| Core i7-6850KIntel $115Bench 84%, 29,279 samples | 28x |
| Core i7-6900KIntel $120Bench 86%, 6,755 samples | 23x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples | 31x |
| GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples | 27x |
| GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples | 21x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 68% - Good | Total price: $770 |