HP p6632f

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 48.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	HP p6632f (all builds)
Motherboard	FOXCONN 2AB1
Memory	2.2 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20100721
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Oct 03 '17 at 05:52
Run Duration	178 Seconds
Run User	CAN-User
Background CPU	21%

PC Performing above expectations (60^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Athlon II X3 445-$100 3,101 User benchmarks, average bench 44% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 3 threads Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	48.5% Average	Memory 74.2 1-Core 45.6 2-Core 90.4 45% 70.1 Pts	4-Core 134 8-Core 136 18% 135 Pts	64-Core 131 8% 131 Pts
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 48.5% Great: 51%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Hitachi Deskstar 7K1000.C 1TB-$40 97,793 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 610GB free Firmware: JP4OA3GC Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing above expectations (81^st percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 99 0 (02) Throughput performance 136 100 93 (03) Spinup time 118 100 12906266939 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 1426 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 140 100 30 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 1945 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 1005 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (B9) Unknown 100 100 65535 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 85 2001 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 66 61 404881442 (C0) Power-off retract count 99 99 1427 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 99 99 1427 (C2) HDA temperature 176 162 167504642082 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	68.5% Good	Read 115 Write 124 Mixed 114 89% 118 MB/s	4K Read 0.67 4K Write 1.32 4K Mixed 0.38 94% 0.79 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 68.5% Great: 74%
Seagate BUP Slim BK 2TB 21,039 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 607GB free Firmware: 0143 Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	16.9% Very poor	Read 29.8 Write 28.8 Mixed 28.7 22% 29.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.43 4K Mixed 0.3 80% 0.74 MB/s
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 16.9% Great: 67%
WD Blue 500GB (2008)-$29 203,744 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 360GB free Firmware: 12.01C02 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing above expectations (81^st percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 221 184 1950 (04) Start/Stop count 91 91 9304 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 85 85 11211 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 92 92 8613 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 413 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 197 197 9304 (C2) HDA temperature 109 99 38 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	58.8% Above average	Read 115 Write 89.4 Mixed 87.7 73% 97.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.72 4K Write 2.41 4K Mixed 0.42 122% 1.18 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 58.8% Great: 69%
WD WD1600BEVS-22UST0 160GB 6,043 User benchmarks, average bench 22% 137GB free (System drive) Firmware: 04.01G04 Max speed: SATA 1.0 150 MB/s Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 186 184 1666 (04) Start/Stop count 95 95 5889 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 83 83 12573 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 96 96 4716 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 272 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 97 97 311523 (C2) HDA temperature 111 97 36 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 253 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0	22.7% Poor	Read 40.1 Write 39.1 Mixed 38.5 30% 39.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.07 4K Write 0.42 4K Mixed 0.09 21% 0.2 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 22.7% Great: 34%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378B5673FH0-CH9 2x2GB 3,211 User benchmarks, average bench 35% 2 of 4 slots used 4GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz Performing as expected (45^th percentile)	30% Poor	MC Read 13.2 MC Write 6.6 MC Mixed 11.3 30% 10.4 GB/s	SC Read 6.9 SC Write 6.1 SC Mixed 8.2 20% 7.07 GB/s	Latency 92 44% 92 ns
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 30% Great: 53%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

HP p6632f

Performance Results

PC Performing above expectations (60th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Feedback

PC Performing above expectations (60^th percentile)