Gigabyte GA-MA770-US3

Performance Results


Gaming 7% Tree trunk	Desktop 48% Yacht	Workstation 6% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 47.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	9.31% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	31.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-MA770-US3 (all builds)
Memory	12.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display	1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20100514
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Oct 03 '17 at 11:05
Run Duration	151 Seconds
Run User	RUS-User
Background CPU	12%

PC Performing as expected (59^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Athlon II X4 630 7,197 User benchmarks, average bench 45% Socket M2, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)	47.1% Average	Memory 67.2 1-Core 41.5 2-Core 81.2 41% 63.3 Pts	4-Core 158 8-Core 159 21% 159 Pts	64-Core 156 10% 156 Pts
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 47.1% Great: 53%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 650-$112 69,673 User benchmarks, average bench 8% Asus(1043 8439) 1GB CLim: 1071 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 385.69 Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	9.31% Terrible	Lighting 10.4 Reflection 9.54 Parallax 12.1 8% 10.7 fps	MRender 13.9 Gravity 12.5 Splatting 13.4 11% 13.3 fps
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 9.31% Great: 9%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingdian S200 60GB 737 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 5GB free (System drive) Firmware: Q0707A Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below potential (4^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 3 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 18 (A0) Unknown 100 100 0 (A1) Unknown 100 100 271 (A2) Unknown 100 100 1 (A3) Unknown 100 100 14 (A4) Unknown 100 100 12833 (A5) Unknown 100 100 7 (A6) Unknown 100 100 3 (A7) Unknown 100 100 6 (A8) Unknown 100 100 3000 (A9) Unknown 100 100 100 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 10 (C2) HDA temperature 100 100 49 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 0 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (F1) Unknown 100 100 12071 (F2) Unknown 100 100 10856 (F5) Unknown 100 100 12449	31.7% Below average	Read 217 Write 89.1 Mixed 109 30% 139 MB/s	4K Read 20.1 4K Write 46.5 4K Mixed 2.14 58% 22.9 MB/s	DQ Read 21.6 DQ Write 61.6 DQ Mixed 3.9 14% 29 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 31.7% Great: 69%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.11 500GB-$80 27,325 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 456GB free Firmware: SD1A Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 112 97 47514363 (03) Spinup time 95 93 0 (04) Start/Stop count 95 95 6042 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 79 60 8776223330 (09) Power-on hours count 84 84 14604 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 41 (0C) Power cycle count 95 95 5272 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 1 1 239 (BC) Unknown 100 97 51540459554 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 63 44 34998321189 (C2) HDA temperature 37 56 42949672997 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 37 20 47514363 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	58.4% Above average	Read 101 Write 102 Mixed 72.6 69% 92 MB/s	4K Read 0.83 4K Write 1.78 4K Mixed 0.49 122% 1.04 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 58.4% Great: 59%
Seagate ST3160811AS 160GB-$45 4,832 User benchmarks, average bench 31% 119GB free Firmware: 3.AAE Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 98 87 113065399 (03) Spinup time 97 95 0 (04) Start/Stop count 91 91 9229 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 1 (07) Seek error rate 88 60 686926521 (09) Power-on hours count 79 79 18665 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 99 0 (0C) Power cycle count 93 93 7757 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 61 40 690290727 (C2) HDA temperature 39 60 55834574887 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 56 46 114390323 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 100 253 0	39.7% Below average	Read 69.9 Write 68.4 Mixed 24.1 40% 54.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.62 4K Write 1.31 4K Mixed 0.4 94% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 39.7% Great: 40%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 4x4GB 106,178 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 4 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM Performing below potential (5^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	22.9% Poor	MC Read 8.1 MC Write 7.1 MC Mixed 7.9 22% 7.7 GB/s	SC Read 5.3 SC Write 6.3 SC Mixed 6 17% 5.87 GB/s	Latency 108 37% 108 ns
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 22.9% Great: 61%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-MA770-US3 Builds (Compare 19 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 53%

Yacht

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-MA770-US3

CPU
Phenom II X4 955AMD $83Bench 51%, 41,403 samples	6x
Phenom II X4 965AMD $144Bench 53%, 43,442 samples	3x
Phenom 9750AMDBench 44%, 1,906 samples	2x

GPU
HD 4870ATIBench 9%, 22,563 samples	3x
GeForce 9600 GTNvidiaBench 4%, 20,826 samples	2x
HD 7750AMDBench 8%, 22,655 samples	2x

SSD
Burst 120GBPatriotBench 66%, 15,567 samples	3x
SSD 120GBBench 68%, 22,748 samples	2x
A400 120GBKingston $32Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	2x

RAM
4x2GBUnknownBench 25%, 183,252 samples	11x
2x2GBUnknownBench 20%, 446,702 samples	3x
4x4GBUnknownBench 43%, 106,178 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 72% - Very good

Total price: $83

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16