Asrock B75M-GL R2.0

Performance Results


Gaming 21% Surfboard	Desktop 76% Battleship	Workstation 18% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	25.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	87.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago.

Motherboard	Asrock B75M-GL R2.0 (all builds)
Memory	4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit farver
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20131001
Uptime	0.5 Days
Run Date	Oct 03 '17 at 21:28
Run Duration	135 Seconds
Run User	DNK-User
Background CPU	21%

PC Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-2600-$197 185,630 User benchmarks, average bench 67% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)	69.5% Good	Memory 83.3 1-Core 92.4 2-Core 177 69% 118 Pts	4-Core 301 8-Core 449 47% 375 Pts	64-Core 448 28% 448 Pts
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 69.5% Great: 74%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD R9 290-$399 68,699 User benchmarks, average bench 46% XFX(1682 9295) CLim: 980 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 17.1.1 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	25.5% Poor	Lighting 15.7 Reflection 50.9 Parallax 53 13% 39.9 fps	MRender 56.7 Gravity 51 Splatting 72 50% 59.9 fps
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 25.5% Great: 50%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 58GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT01B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 3901 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 787 (B1) Unknown 96 96 64 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 60 46 40 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 69 (F1) Unknown 99 99 19095771500	87.8% Excellent	Read 505 Write 405 Mixed 418 98% 443 MB/s	4K Read 33.1 4K Write 62.5 4K Mixed 27 118% 40.9 MB/s	DQ Read 158 DQ Write 177 DQ Mixed 83.1 86% 139 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 87.8% Great: 124%
Hitachi HDE721010SLA330 1TB-$84 9,234 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 262GB free Firmware: ST6OA31B Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing below expectations (40^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 133 133 111 (03) Spinup time 118 118 38686818788 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 1758 (05) Reallocated sector count 39 39 1210 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 125 125 33 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 5479 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 844 (C0) Power-off retract count 99 99 1769 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 99 99 1769 (C2) HDA temperature 146 146 214749020201 (C4) Reallocation count 1 1 3697 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	45.8% Average	Read 82.5 Write 77 Mixed 79.5 60% 79.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.58 4K Mixed 0.46 105% 0.88 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 45.8% Great: 63%
Seagate Constellation CS 1TB 852 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 254GB free Firmware: CN02 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (24^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 82 63 189003600 (03) Spinup time 97 97 0 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 1292 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 78 60 68686162 (09) Power-on hours count 95 95 5246 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1304 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 66 57 4916969506 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 127 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 1430 (C2) HDA temperature 34 43 -140737488355294 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	75.4% Very good	Read 117 Write 146 Mixed 138 101% 134 MB/s	4K Read 0.57 4K Write 1.93 4K Mixed 0.21 83% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 75.4% Great: 113%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance LP DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GB 27,024 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 2 of 2 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing below potential (18^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	42.9% Average	MC Read 15.2 MC Write 14.3 MC Mixed 13.6 41% 14.4 GB/s	SC Read 13.2 SC Write 14.5 SC Mixed 13.4 39% 13.7 GB/s	Latency 74.6 54% 74.6 ns
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 42.9% Great: 63%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical B75M-GL R2.0 Builds (Compare 228 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 59%

Gunboat

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock B75M-GL R2.0 - $76

CPU
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples	34x
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	31x
Core i5-3570IntelBench 65%, 104,858 samples	25x

GPU
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples	18x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	16x
GTX 1060-3GBNvidia $119Bench 52%, 627,793 samples	13x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	17x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	11x
SSDNow V300 120GBKingston $37Bench 54%, 339,020 samples	7x

RAM
Ballistix Sport DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBCrucialBench 56%, 44,086 samples	5x
HMT451U6AFR8C-PB 2x4GBHynixBench 52%, 14,558 samples	5x
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 54%, 77,652 samples	4x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 72% - Very good

Total price: $163

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16