Asus P6T

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 30%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics54.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive32.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus P6T  (all builds)
Memory2.6 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100308
Uptime9.7 Days
Run DateOct 09 '17 at 18:04
Run Duration396 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing below expectations (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-920-$90
LGA1366, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 2.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
67% Good
Memory 91.2
1-Core 65.1
2-Core 124
59% 93.4 Pts
4-Core 234
8-Core 344
36% 289 Pts
64-Core 343
21% 343 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 67%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
CLim: 1519 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 382.5
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
54.7% Above average
Lighting 69.4
Reflection 67.8
Parallax 60.4
57% 65.9 fps
MRender 69
Gravity 62.8
Splatting 57.3
51% 63 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 54.7%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 250GB-$251
31GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DXT09B0Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
32.1% Below average
Read 192
Write 58.6
Mixed 51
22% 100 MB/s
4K Read 20.8
4K Write 42.7
4K Mixed 10.1
67% 24.6 MB/s
DQ Read 21.8
DQ Write 44.4
DQ Mixed 9.25
14% 25.2 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 32.1%
Great: 85%
Hitachi HDS723020BLA642 2TB-$249
110GB free
Firmware: MN6OA580 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
49.3% Average
Read 81.5
Write 90.2
Mixed 70
60% 80.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.52
4K Write 1.25
4K Mixed 0.34
83% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 49.3%
Great: 85%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$70
62GB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
40.7% Average
Read 68.7
Write 73
Mixed 17.3
38% 53 MB/s
4K Read 0.38
4K Write 1.43
4K Mixed 0.21
66% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 40.7%
Great: 67%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$49
41GB free
Firmware: 05.00K05 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
48.6% Average
Read 92.3
Write 76.5
Mixed 22.4
46% 63.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.58
4K Write 2.33
4K Mixed 0.4
111% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 48.6%
Great: 76%
WD WD3000GLFS-01F8U0 300GB
7GB free
Firmware: 03.03V01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
50.1% Above average
Read 83.2
Write 90.8
Mixed 80.6
64% 84.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.83
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 0.58
149% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 50.1%
Great: 68%
HP v125w 16GB
2GB free, PID 3307
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
6.4% Terrible
Read 25.2
Write 6.26
Mixed 8.49
14% 13.3 MB/s
4K Read 5.76
4K Write 0.009
4K Mixed 0.008
22% 1.93 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 6.4%
Great: 9%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 6x2GB
6 of 6 slots used
12GB DIMM
Performing below potential (38th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
41.7% Average
MC Read 15.9
MC Write 12.1
MC Mixed 15.2
41% 14.4 GB/s
SC Read 9.6
SC Write 8.9
SC Mixed 10.9
28% 9.8 GB/s
Latency 65.5
61% 65.5 ns
Poor: 37%
This bench: 41.7%
Great: 59%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P6T Builds (Compare 1,164 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 33%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus P6T

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $318
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback