Asus 970 PRO GAMING/AURA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 26%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics42.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive52.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (33%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago.
MotherboardAsus 970 PRO GAMING/AURA  (all builds)
Memory8.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160816
Uptime23.1 Days
Run DateOct 11 '17 at 01:14
Run Duration143 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 33%
Watch Gameplay: 480 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (26th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8320E-$87
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
55.1% Above average
Memory 75.2
1-Core 56.3
2-Core 108
50% 79.9 Pts
4-Core 190
8-Core 332
32% 261 Pts
64-Core 334
21% 334 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 55.1%
Great: 65%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 480-$75
CLim: 1266 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 17.1.1
Performing below potential (34th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
42.6% Average
Lighting 51.8
Reflection 60.1
Parallax 69.8
42% 60.6 fps
MRender 59.9
Gravity 50.6
Splatting 50.1
43% 53.5 fps
Poor: 35%
This bench: 42.6%
Great: 53%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow KC300 120GB-$80
59GB free
Firmware: 507KC4 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
52.7% Above average
Read 470
Write 194
Mixed 243
66% 302 MB/s
4K Read 23.2
4K Write 40.7
4K Mixed 10.9
71% 25 MB/s
DQ Read 25.4
DQ Write 46.4
DQ Mixed 44.7
31% 38.8 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 52.7%
Great: 86%
Toshiba Q Series Pro 128GB-$66
44GB free (System drive)
Firmware: JTRA0102 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
52.3% Above average
Read 489
Write 80.2
Mixed 474
77% 348 MB/s
4K Read 17.6
4K Write 40.4
4K Mixed 27.2
83% 28.4 MB/s
DQ Read 21
DQ Write 49
DQ Mixed 15.9
18% 28.7 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 52.3%
Great: 107%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37
613GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
88.2% Excellent
Read 161
Write 146
Mixed 143
113% 150 MB/s
4K Read 1.13
4K Write 2.19
4K Mixed 0.33
125% 1.22 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 88.2%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX1600C9D3/4G KHX1600C9D3/4G BLS4G3D169DS3J.8FN BLS4G3D169DS3J.8FN 16GB
1066, 1066, 1066, 1066 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
35.8% Below average
MC Read 13
MC Write 12.7
MC Mixed 12.2
36% 12.6 GB/s
SC Read 7.6
SC Write 7.9
SC Mixed 9.6
24% 8.37 GB/s
Latency 90
44% 90 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 35.8%
Great: 38%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 970 PRO GAMING/AURA Builds (Compare 901 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus 970 PRO GAMING/AURA - $299

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $588
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback