Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing CPU, RAM
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way above expectations (96th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 4 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
Graphics	3.79% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	90.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Very high background CPU (68%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

9 years ago, 9 years ago.

PC Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-3320M-$199 30,496 User benchmarks, average bench 48% Socket rPGA988B, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete		1-Core 81.2 2-Core 137 51% 109 Pts	4-Core 241 8-Core 243 32% 242 Pts	64-Core 248 15% 248 Pts
Poor: 30% Great: 57%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz) 409,110 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Toshiba(1179 0001) 2GB Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2712 Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	3.79% Terrible	Lighting 4.07 Reflection 5.35 Parallax 3.03 3% 4.15 fps	MRender 5.57 Gravity 2.47 Splatting 8.26 5% 5.43 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 3.79% Great: 4%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Toshiba THNSNF128GCSS 128GB 2,061 User benchmarks, average bench 68% 60GB free (System drive) Firmware: FSTA Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 844 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 294 (A7) Unknown 100 100 0 (A8) Unknown 100 100 0 (A9) Unknown 100 100 100 (AA) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 200 200 0 (AF) Unknown 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 28 (C2) HDA temperature 72 50 214749282332 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 100 0	90.1% Outstanding	Read 509 Write 464 Mixed 467 107% 480 MB/s	4K Read 21 4K Write 29.4 4K Mixed 34.3 91% 28.2 MB/s	DQ Read 333 DQ Write 205 DQ Mixed 130 134% 223 MB/s
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 90.1% Great: 90%

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 52%

Yacht

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 409,110 samples	80x
Radeon HD 7500MAMDBench 4%, 12,745 samples	16x
HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 209,058 samples	6x

SSD
SSDSA2BW080G3H 80GBIntelBench 37%, 403 samples	6x
CS900 240GBPNY $20Bench 73%, 61,417 samples	3x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	3x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16