Asus PRIME X370-PRO

Performance Results


Gaming 79% Battleship	Desktop 85% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 81% Aircraft carrier


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	90.4% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	83% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asus PRIME X370-PRO (all builds)
Memory	14.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display	Цвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170908
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Oct 18 '17 at 12:35
Run Duration	229 Seconds
Run User	BLR-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing as expected (54^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 1700X-$225 66,470 User benchmarks, average bench 71% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.75 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	82.9% Excellent	Memory 79.3 1-Core 116 2-Core 232 79% 142 Pts	4-Core 463 8-Core 921 82% 692 Pts	64-Core 1,286 80% 1,286 Pts
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 82.9% Great: 80%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX Vega-64LC (Liquid Cooled)-$1,700 4,268 User benchmarks, average bench 94% AMD(1002 6B76) Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 22.19.659.0 Performing below potential (19^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	90.4% Outstanding	Lighting 104 Reflection 99 Parallax 176 85% 126 fps	MRender 91.4 Gravity 129 Splatting 141 101% 120 fps
Poor: 85% ↑ This bench: 90.4% Great: 98%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
OCZ Vertex 4 128GB-$215 19,372 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 70GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1.5 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 5 0 5 (03) Spinup time 100 100 0 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 29890 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 1711 (E8) Unknown 100 100 50079665677 (E9) Unknown 92 0 92	83% Excellent	Read 454 Write 377 Mixed 396 91% 409 MB/s	4K Read 27.5 4K Write 100 4K Mixed 20.2 121% 49.3 MB/s	DQ Read 27.3 DQ Write 266 DQ Mixed 112 97% 135 MB/s
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 83% Great: 104%
WD Blue 2.5" 500GB (2009)-$50 31,419 User benchmarks, average bench 32% 124GB free Firmware: 01.01A02 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 1 (03) Spinup time 186 179 1666 (04) Start/Stop count 96 96 4798 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 76 76 17531 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 96 96 4651 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 565 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 102 102 294297 (C2) HDA temperature 117 97 30 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 253 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 4410 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0	44.7% Average	Read 80.3 Write 75.3 Mixed 75.3 58% 77 MB/s	4K Read 0.33 4K Write 1.42 4K Mixed 0.34 78% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 44.7% Great: 43%
Samsung HD403LJ 400GB-$183 4,107 User benchmarks, average bench 31% 56GB free Firmware: CT100-13 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 95 0 (03) Spinup time 100 100 7680 (04) Start/Stop count 92 92 8637 (05) Reallocated sector count 253 253 0 (07) Seek error rate 253 253 0 (08) Seek timer performance 253 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 48582 (0A) Spinup retry count 253 253 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 253 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 96 96 4099 (0D) Soft read error rate 100 100 165835 (BB) vendor-specific 1 1 1049899 (BC) Unknown 91 91 913 (BE) vendor-specific 68 45 32 (C2) HDA temperature 139 70 33 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 165835 (C4) Reallocation count 253 253 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 253 89 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 253 253 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 187 223 (C8) Write error rate 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 253 91 0 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 100 100 13	21% Poor	Read 34.6 Write 38.4 Mixed 27.9 25% 33.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.56 4K Write 0.96 4K Mixed 0.31 76% 0.61 MB/s
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 21% Great: 42%
WD Green 1TB (2009)-$65 103,919 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 22GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 1 (03) Spinup time 162 144 6900 (04) Start/Stop count 93 93 7442 (05) Reallocated sector count 171 171 229 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 42 42 42798 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 96 96 4589 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 675 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 198 198 7435 (C2) HDA temperature 120 97 30 (C4) Reallocation count 1 1 228 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 106211 (C8) Write error rate 200 173 0	25.1% Poor	Read 46.1 Write 40.9 Mixed 38.3 31% 41.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.57 4K Write 1.65 4K Mixed 0.29 86% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 25.1% Great: 57%
JetFlash Transcend 32GB 11,405 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 21GB free, PID 1000 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	41% Average	Read 197 Write 44.2 Mixed 43.5 90% 94.7 MB/s	4K Read 7.5 4K Write 0.35 4K Mixed 0.28 49% 2.71 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 41% Great: 58%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB-$45 653,654 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 2933 MHz clocked @ 1467 MHz Performing below potential (74^th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	95.2% Outstanding	MC Read 41.2 MC Write 31 MC Mixed 30.7 98% 34.3 GB/s	SC Read 23.2 SC Write 39.2 SC Mixed 27.6 86% 30 GB/s	Latency 81.9 49% 81.9 ns
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 95.2% Great: 110%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical PRIME X370-PRO Builds (Compare 2,528 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 74%

Battleship

Desktop 75%

Battleship

Workstation 72%

Battleship

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X370-PRO - $109

CPU
Ryzen 7 1700AMD $195Bench 69%, 144,475 samples	417x
Ryzen 7 1700XAMD $225Bench 71%, 66,470 samples	326x
Ryzen 5 1600AMD $110Bench 70%, 392,253 samples	204x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	215x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	194x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	189x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	94x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	89x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GBSamsung $45Bench 199%, 240,629 samples	75x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	160x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	122x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $36Bench 84%, 287,720 samples	57x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $847

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Asus PRIME X370-PRO

Performance Results

PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X370-PRO - $109

Feedback

PC Performing as expected (54^th percentile)