HP Z220 CMT Workstation

Performance Results


Gaming 11% Tree trunk	Desktop 74% Battleship	Workstation 10% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	7.28% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	82.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago, 5 years ago.

System	HP Z220 CMT Workstation (all builds)
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 1790
Memory	13.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1400 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20121029
Uptime	0.9 Days
Run Date	Oct 19 '17 at 11:06
Run Duration	326 Seconds
Run User	SRB-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing as expected (45^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-3770-$297 278,207 User benchmarks, average bench 69% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	79% Very good	Memory 88.3 1-Core 108 2-Core 215 78% 137 Pts	4-Core 381 8-Core 520 57% 450 Pts	64-Core 522 32% 522 Pts
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 79% Great: 76%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD HD 5770 37,602 User benchmarks, average bench 10% Sapphire(174B 1482) 1GB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.301.1901.0 Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	7.28% Terrible	Lighting 9.57 Reflection 7.08 Parallax 7.84 8% 8.16 fps	MRender 7.14 Gravity 6.77 Splatting 8.65 6% 7.52 fps
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 7.28% Great: 11%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Ts256gss TS25670 256GB 35 User benchmarks, average bench 80% 155GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2014 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (49^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 3281 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 1324 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 74 (C2) HDA temperature 100 100 47 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 333666 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 1109 (A0) Unknown 100 100 0 (A1) Unknown 100 100 40 (A3) Unknown 100 100 30 (A4) Unknown 100 100 32900 (A5) Unknown 100 100 86 (A6) Unknown 100 100 3 (A7) Unknown 100 100 32 (A8) Unknown 100 100 3000 (A9) Unknown 100 100 100 (E8) Unknown 100 100 100 (B1) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (F1) Unknown 100 100 156209 (F2) Unknown 100 100 164863	82.8% Excellent	Read 515 Write 285 Mixed 371 86% 390 MB/s	4K Read 25.9 4K Write 63.8 4K Mixed 26.3 107% 38.7 MB/s	DQ Read 272 DQ Write 286 DQ Mixed 50.6 101% 203 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 82.8% Great: 97%
Toshiba DT01ACA300 3TB-$80 85,620 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 1.5TB free Firmware: MX6O Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (39^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 140 140 69 (03) Spinup time 135 135 34387460521 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 1000 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 124 124 33 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 2149 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 351 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 1011 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 1011 (C2) HDA temperature 193 193 214749675551 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 20677	80.8% Excellent	Read 161 Write 121 Mixed 140 106% 141 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 0.57 4K Mixed 0.22 64% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 80.8% Great: 107%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$70 212,471 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 674GB free Firmware: 80.0 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 163 159 8808 (04) Start/Stop count 94 94 6456 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 39 39 44866 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 2611 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 454 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 1 1 2547547 (C2) HDA temperature 119 101 33 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	38.2% Below average	Read 75.7 Write 57.8 Mixed 63.5 49% 65.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.38 4K Write 0.15 4K Mixed 0.15 36% 0.23 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 38.2% Great: 67%
WD WD20EURS-63S48Y0 2TB 12,928 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 389GB free Firmware: 51.0 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 192 169 5391 (04) Start/Stop count 94 94 6350 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 45 45 40410 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 2499 (C0) Power-off retract count 195 195 4236 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 157 157 131855 (C2) HDA temperature 120 104 30 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 253 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 1 50693 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0	60% Above average	Read 109 Write 100 Mixed 85.1 74% 98.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.56 4K Write 0.36 4K Mixed 0.16 47% 0.36 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 60% Great: 77%
JetFlash Transcend 16GB 14,782 User benchmarks, average bench 14% 6GB free, PID 1000, Transcend jetflash 600 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing as expected (46^th percentile)	7.85% Terrible	Read 31.1 Write 10.4 Mixed 11 18% 17.5 MB/s	4K Read 4.39 4K Write 0.01 4K Mixed 0.02 17% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 7.85% Great: 33%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown SP004GBLTU160N02 Micron 8JTF51264AZ-1G6E1 86D3 SP004GBLTU160N02 Micron 8JTF51264AZ-1G6E1 16GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	56.1% Above average	MC Read 20.9 MC Write 19.5 MC Mixed 16.9 55% 19.1 GB/s	SC Read 17.1 SC Write 18.8 SC Mixed 18.8 52% 18.2 GB/s	Latency 69.3 58% 69.3 ns
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 56.1% Great: 57%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Z220 CMT Workstation Builds (Compare 1,302 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 25%

Surfboard

Desktop 76%

Battleship

Workstation 21%

Surfboard

System: HP Z220 CMT Workstation

CPU
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	616x
Xeon E3-1225 V2Intel $200Bench 70%, 2,869 samples	158x
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples	108x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	101x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	72x
HD 4000 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 52,547 samples	71x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	42x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	40x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	33x

RAM
M378B5273DH0-CK0 4x4GBSamsungBench 57%, 2,354 samples	33x
16JTF51264AZ-1G6M1 4x4GBMicronBench 55%, 1,512 samples	25x
HMT351U6CFR8C-PB 4x4GBHynixBench 58%, 7,298 samples	25x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 72% - Very good

Total price: $384

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16