Asus M5A99FX PRO R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics17.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive56.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
High background CPU (27%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus M5A99FX PRO R2.0  (all builds)
Memory12 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display4096 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20140407
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 21 '17 at 18:18
Run Duration243 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 27%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8350-$130
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.5 GHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
73.6% Very good
Memory 95.1
1-Core 76.7
2-Core 158
67% 110 Pts
4-Core 282
8-Core 489
47% 386 Pts
64-Core 489
30% 489 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 73.6%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132
CLim: 2062 MHz, MLim: 2007 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 385.41
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
17.5% Very poor
Lighting 19.3
Reflection 23.1
Parallax 18.8
16% 20.4 fps
MRender 29.4
Gravity 20.6
Splatting 26.8
21% 25.6 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 17.5%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$109
88GB free
Firmware: EMT0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
98.1% Outstanding
Read 501
Write 355
Mixed 402
93% 419 MB/s
4K Read 33.4
4K Write 76.5
4K Mixed 43.8
147% 51.2 MB/s
DQ Read 280
DQ Write 191
DQ Mixed 111
116% 194 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 98.1%
Great: 134%
Kingston HyperX 3K 120GB-$100
7GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 507K Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
56.2% Above average
Read 439
Write 161
Mixed 155
55% 252 MB/s
4K Read 14.9
4K Write 57.8
4K Mixed 12.4
69% 28.4 MB/s
DQ Read 205
DQ Write 179
DQ Mixed 38.4
71% 141 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 56.2%
Great: 87%
WD Blue 320GB (2007)-$80
176GB free
Firmware: 01.0 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
41.2% Average
Read 90.4
Write 53
Mixed 72.5
54% 72 MB/s
4K Read 0.65
4K Write 1.99
4K Mixed 0.39
107% 1.01 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 41.2%
Great: 58%
WD Blue 2.5" 500GB-$22
107GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
39.6% Below average
Read 62.9
Write 74.8
Mixed 70.9
52% 69.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.34
4K Write 1.69
4K Mixed 0.18
65% 0.74 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 39.6%
Great: 61%
WD WD1001FALS-00U9B0 1TB
18GB free
Firmware: 20.0 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
51.4% Above average
Read 90.3
Write 88.6
Mixed 71.5
62% 83.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.12
4K Mixed 0.49
114% 1.04 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 51.4%
Great: 73%
WD My Passport 25E2 4TB
2.5TB free, PID 25e2
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
36.8% Below average
Read 101
Write 90.1
Mixed 57
101% 82.8 MB/s
4K Read 1.28
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.09
32% 0.69 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 36.8%
Great: 59%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Team Vulcan-2133 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 2133 MHz clocked @ 1066 MHz
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
58.2% Above average
MC Read 25.1
MC Write 16.8
MC Mixed 21
60% 21 GB/s
SC Read 12.2
SC Write 9.1
SC Mixed 14.6
34% 12 GB/s
Latency 56.7
70% 56.7 ns
Poor: 40%
This bench: 58.2%
Great: 79%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M5A99FX PRO R2.0 Builds (Compare 1,063 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus M5A99FX PRO R2.0 - $200

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 57% - Above average Total price: $610
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $46
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback