Asus M2N-SLI DELUXE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 35%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 32.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics3.56% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive30.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus M2N-SLI DELUXE  (all builds)
Memory1.3 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20060714
Uptime4.9 Days
Run DateOct 30 '17 at 16:22
Run Duration1200 Seconds
Run User GRC-User
Background CPU 15%

 PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 4600+
Socket AM2 , 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
32.7% Below average
Memory 55.4
1-Core 33
2-Core 63.7
33% 50.7 Pts
4-Core 61.1
8-Core 54
8% 57.5 Pts
64-Core 62.1
4% 62.1 Pts
Poor: 22%
This bench: 32.7%
Great: 47%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 630
Palit(1569 0F00) 2GB
CLim: 780 MHz, MLim: 267 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 376.53
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
3.56% Terrible
Lighting 4.47
Reflection 5.15
Parallax 3.41
4% 4.34 fps
MRender 4.86
Gravity 4.53
Splatting 3.43
3% 4.28 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.56%
Great: 5%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Team L3 SSD 120GB
36GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S8FM Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
30.9% Below average
Read 158
Write 152
Mixed 153
34% 154 MB/s
4K Read 13.6
4K Write 32.6
4K Mixed 8.21
48% 18.1 MB/s
DQ Read 17
DQ Write 38.3
DQ Mixed 9.3
12% 21.5 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 30.9%
Great: 71%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016)-$51
1.5TB free
Firmware: CC26 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
89% Excellent
Read 171
Write 140
Mixed 144
114% 151 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.54
4K Mixed 0.28
70% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 89%
Great: 114%
WD WD2500KS-00MJB0 250GB-$78
170GB free
Firmware: 02.0 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
34.3% Below average
Read 59.5
Write 59.7
Mixed 58.7
45% 59.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.87
4K Mixed 0.5
106% 0.92 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 34.3%
Great: 35%
Seagate Backup+ BK 1TB
866GB free, PID a013
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
2.44% Terrible
Read 1.05
Write 0.99
Mixed 1.02
1% 1.02 MB/s
4K Read 0.31
4K Write 0.65
4K Mixed 0.25
32% 0.4 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 2.44%
Great: 43%
Seagate FreeAgent GoFlex 500GB
448GB free, PID 5031
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
13.7% Very poor
Read 31.5
Write 32.7
Mixed 31.5
41% 31.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.43
4K Write 0.61
4K Mixed 0.25
31% 0.43 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 13.7%
Great: 31%
WD My Passport 0830 1TB
368GB free, PID 0830
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
16.4% Very poor
Read 31.2
Write 31.4
Mixed 25
37% 29.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.28
4K Write 1.61
4K Mixed 0.23
64% 0.71 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 16.4%
Great: 45%
ASMT 2105 320GB
257GB free, PID 55aa
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
15.6% Very poor
Read 32.6
Write 32.6
Mixed 32.8
42% 32.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.45
4K Write 1.19
4K Mixed 0.27
51% 0.64 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 15.6%
Great: 42%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x1GB
4 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM
Performing below potential (16th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
11.7% Very poor
MC Read 3.5
MC Write 3.5
MC Mixed 3.4
10% 3.47 GB/s
SC Read 3.5
SC Write 3.6
SC Mixed 3.8
10% 3.63 GB/s
Latency 142
28% 142 ns
Poor: 11%
This bench: 11.7%
Great: 28%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M2N-SLI DELUXE Builds (Compare 38 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus M2N-SLI DELUXE

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback