Lenovo 2429MU9

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (9th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 91 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 51.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics2.21% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive53.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (25%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo 2429MU9  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 2429MU9
Memory10.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160824
Uptime2.1 Days
Run DateNov 03 '17 at 11:56
Run Duration98 Seconds
Run User CHE-User
Background CPU 25%

 PC Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3820QM-$275
CPU Socket - U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 1.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
51.6% Above average
Memory 80.1
1-Core 33.1
2-Core 66.7
42% 60 Pts
4-Core 127
8-Core 257
23% 192 Pts
64-Core 490
30% 490 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 51.6%
Great: 75%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)
Legend(17AA 21F5) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4491
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
2.21% Terrible
Lighting 2.43
Reflection 3.15
Parallax 1.62
2% 2.4 fps
MRender 3.43
Gravity 1.33
Splatting 4.52
3% 3.09 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.21%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 520 Series 240GB-$139
141GB free (System drive)
Firmware: LF1i Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
53.3% Above average
Read 511
Write 241
Mixed 321
79% 358 MB/s
4K Read 13
4K Write 30.2
4K Mixed 9.39
48% 17.5 MB/s
DQ Read 96.6
DQ Write 85.3
DQ Mixed 42.7
45% 74.8 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 53.3%
Great: 95%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B1G73BH0-CK0 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
46.7% Average
MC Read 18.5
MC Write 17.9
MC Mixed 16.6
50% 17.7 GB/s
SC Read 7.4
SC Write 6.2
SC Mixed 6.5
19% 6.7 GB/s
Latency 80.3
50% 80.3 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 46.7%
Great: 57%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback