Acer Aspire M5910

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 5% Tree trunk	Desktop 49% Yacht	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 50%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	8.7% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (82%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Acer Aspire M5910 (all builds)
Motherboard	Acer Aspire M5910
Memory	1.8 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20100517
Uptime	22.6 Days
Run Date	Nov 04 '17 at 09:42
Run Duration	200 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	82%

PC Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7 860-$339 51,451 User benchmarks, average bench 64% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	50% Average	Memory 74.7 1-Core 56 2-Core 91.3 48% 74 Pts	4-Core 138 8-Core 257 24% 198 Pts	64-Core 258 16% 258 Pts
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 50% Great: 72%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD HD 5750 12,403 User benchmarks, average bench 8% Sapphire(174B E160) 1GB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008 Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	8.7% Terrible	Lighting 11.4 Reflection 9.15 Parallax 9.5 9% 10 fps	MRender 8.57 Gravity 8.17 Splatting 10.3 8% 9.01 fps
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 8.7% Great: 9%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 72GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 1221 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 1514 (B1) Unknown 99 99 18 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 60 52 40 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 31 (F1) Unknown 99 99 13075686808
Poor: 72% Great: 124%
Seagate NAS HDD 2TB-$98 3,967 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 886GB free Firmware: SC60 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 105 99 9556032 (03) Spinup time 97 95 0 (04) Start/Stop count 93 93 7814 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 63 60 2388933 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 2566 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 97 97 3407 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 70 70 30 (BE) vendor-specific 63 52 622985253 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 89 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 97 97 7814 (C2) HDA temperature 37 48 68719476773 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	45.1% Average	Read 80.2 Write 76.9 Mixed 71.4 57% 76.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.49 4K Write 1.27 4K Mixed 0.13 58% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 45.1% Great: 100%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70 337,642 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 803GB free Firmware: JC4B Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (81^st percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 113 99 55411255 (03) Spinup time 100 100 0 (04) Start/Stop count 94 94 6410 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 68 60 8603681004 (09) Power-on hours count 96 96 3943 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 95 95 5822 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 99 12885098499 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 65 55 589365283 (C2) HDA temperature 35 45 64424509475 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 46 28 55411255 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 -76338748699871 (F1) Unknown 100 253 4144480117 (F2) Unknown 100 253 2798411163	62.9% Good	Read 108 Write 111 Mixed 99.8 80% 106 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.28 4K Mixed 0.56 115% 0.85 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 62.9% Great: 68%
SanDisk Ultra USB 3.0 64GB-$9 17,023 User benchmarks, average bench 27% 58GB free, PID 5581 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	11.9% Very poor	Read 31.3 Write 18.6 Mixed 22.9 29% 24.2 MB/s	4K Read 2.64 4K Write 0.86 4K Mixed 0.49 56% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 11.9% Great: 39%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown CMX8GX3M2B1333C9 029E CMX8GX3M2B1333C9 80CE M378B5673GB0-CH9 80CE M378B5673GB0-CH9 12GB 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096, 2048, 2048 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	21.3% Poor	MC Read 7.5 MC Write 7 MC Mixed 6.1 20% 6.87 GB/s	SC Read 4.7 SC Write 6 SC Mixed 5.4 15% 5.37 GB/s	Latency 91 44% 91 ns

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Aspire M5910 Builds (Compare 178 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 9%

Tree trunk

Desktop 54%

Yacht

Workstation 8%

Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire M5910

CPU
Core i5 650Intel $70Bench 46%, 42,063 samples	68x
Core i7 870Intel $100Bench 66%, 37,228 samples	59x
Core i7 860Intel $339Bench 64%, 51,451 samples	33x

GPU
GTX 460Nvidia $203Bench 12%, 31,648 samples	12x
GeForce GT 320NvidiaBench 3%, 2,109 samples	9x
GTX 660Nvidia $170Bench 20%, 123,956 samples	9x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	11x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	9x
X150 480GBEmtecBench 75%, 1,954 samples	7x

RAM
CT25664BA1339A.M16 859B CT25664BA1339A.M16 0198 ACR256X64D3U1333C9 0198 ACR256X64D3U1333C9 8GBUnknownBench 34%, 7 samples	7x
M378B5273DH0-CH9 80CE M378B5273DH0-CH9 830B NT2GC64B88B0NF-CG 830B NT2GC64B88B0NF-CG 12GBUnknownBench 35%, 7 samples	6x
ACR256X64D3U1333C9 0198 ACR256X64D3U1333C9 859B CT25664BA1339A.M16 859B CT25664BA1339A.M16 8GBUnknownBench 37%, 7 samples	6x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 27% - Poor

Total price: $301

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16