HP h8-1437c

Performance Results


Gaming 29% Raft	Desktop 78% Battleship	Workstation 23% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	34.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	98% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	28GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 28GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.

Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago.

System	HP h8-1437c (all builds)
Motherboard	PEGATRON 2AD5
Memory	25.4 GB free of 28 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 8.1
BIOS Date	20120828
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Nov 12 '17 at 02:10
Run Duration	141 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	11%

Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-3470-$59 223,595 User benchmarks, average bench 63% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	69.1% Good	Memory 83.8 1-Core 93.3 2-Core 188 70% 122 Pts	4-Core 309 8-Core 352 43% 330 Pts	64-Core 363 22% 363 Pts
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 69.1% Great: 71%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% EVGA(3842 6256) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 388.13 Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	34.3% Below average	Lighting 44.8 Reflection 30.3 Parallax 36.9 36% 37.3 fps	MRender 36 Gravity 40 Splatting 34.9 30% 36.9 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 34.3% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Pro 256GB-$115 141,929 User benchmarks, average bench 102% 214GB free Firmware: EXM01B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (74^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 97 97 13261 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 588 (B1) Unknown 99 99 2 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 70 59 30 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 7 (F1) Unknown 99 99 1367270443	112% Outstanding	Read 524 Write 493 Mixed 511 114% 509 MB/s	4K Read 32.2 4K Write 84.5 4K Mixed 43.6 149% 53.4 MB/s	DQ Read 350 DQ Write 315 DQ Mixed 147 161% 271 MB/s
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 112% Great: 124%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 149GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (30^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 2341 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 1158 (B1) Unknown 98 98 24 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 66 56 34 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 4 (F1) Unknown 99 99 13177057318	98% Outstanding	Read 515 Write 412 Mixed 421 100% 449 MB/s	4K Read 38 4K Write 68.6 4K Mixed 29.3 131% 45.3 MB/s	DQ Read 309 DQ Write 268 DQ Mixed 22.5 90% 200 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 98% Great: 124%
Toshiba DT01ACA300 3TB-$80 85,620 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 388GB free Firmware: MX6OABB0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 140 140 69 (03) Spinup time 136 136 30092755361 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 1520 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 124 124 33 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 2819 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 1309 (C0) Power-off retract count 99 99 1532 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 99 99 1532 (C2) HDA temperature 187 187 193274642464 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	60.5% Good	Read 106 Write 105 Mixed 111 81% 107 MB/s	4K Read 0.69 4K Write 1.79 4K Mixed 0.2 84% 0.89 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 60.5% Great: 107%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMT351U6CFR8C-PB 859B BLS8G3D1609DS1S00. Samsung M378B1G73BH0-CK0 859B BLS8G3D1609DS1S00. 28GB 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	59.7% Above average	MC Read 22.1 MC Write 22.6 MC Mixed 18.7 60% 21.1 GB/s	SC Read 16.3 SC Write 16.1 SC Mixed 18.1 48% 16.8 GB/s	Latency 73.8 54% 73.8 ns

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical h8-1437c Builds (Compare 30 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 60%

Destroyer

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

System: HP h8-1437c

CPU
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples	26x
Core i5-3570IntelBench 65%, 104,858 samples	3x
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	1x

GPU
GeForce GT 620NvidiaBench 2%, 17,163 samples	12x
GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples	4x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	4x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	3x
WDS100T2G0A-00JH30 1TBWDCBench 54%, 17,953 samples	3x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	2x

RAM
HMT351U6CFR8C-PB Samsung M378B1G73BH0-CK0 12GBHynixBench 42%, 122 samples	8x
16JTF51264AZ-1G6M1 Samsung M378B1G73BH0-CK0 12GBMicronBench 43%, 73 samples	3x
RMR5040MM58F9F1600 Samsung M378B1G73BH0-CK0 12GBRamaxelBench 37%, 29 samples	3x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 57% - Above average

Total price: $139

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16