Gigabyte GA-AB350-Gaming 3-CF

Performance Results


Gaming 35% Jet ski	Desktop 70% Battle cruiser	Workstation 33% Sail boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	51.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	33.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (28%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Gigabyte AB350-Gaming 3
Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-AB350-Gaming 3-CF (all builds)
Memory	2 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170818
Uptime	0.7 Days
Run Date	Nov 15 '17 at 22:18
Run Duration	160 Seconds
Run User	NLD-User
Background CPU	28%

Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 1600-$110 392,253 User benchmarks, average bench 70% AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	64.1% Good	Memory 66.5 1-Core 94.8 2-Core 168 63% 110 Pts	4-Core 331 8-Core 585 55% 458 Pts	64-Core 743 46% 743 Pts
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 64.1% Great: 78%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132 1,459,281 User benchmarks, average bench 80% Asus(1043 8598) CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 388.13 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	51.8% Above average	Lighting 64.5 Reflection 85.6 Parallax 78.8 52% 76.3 fps	MRender 82.3 Gravity 67.3 Splatting 43.4 50% 64.3 fps
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 51.8% Great: 88%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 79GB free Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (24^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 2387 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 316 (B1) Unknown 99 99 8 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 67 53 33 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 13 (F1) Unknown 99 99 4753029876	94.3% Outstanding	Read 505 Write 411 Mixed 414 99% 444 MB/s	4K Read 37.5 4K Write 71.7 4K Mixed 38.3 144% 49.2 MB/s	DQ Read 39.8 DQ Write 178 DQ Mixed 80.6 70% 99.5 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 94.3% Great: 124%
Intel X25-M 80GB 12,660 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 8GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2CV102HD Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing as expected (47^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (03) Spinup time 100 100 0 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 11 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 9173 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 1839 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 58 (E1) Load/Unload cycle count 200 200 639173 (E2) Load-in time 100 100 5649 (E3) Torque amplification count 100 100 0 (E4) Power-off retract count 100 100 881207205 (E8) Unknown 99 99 0 (E9) Unknown 93 93 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0	33.2% Below average	Read 252 Write 71.6 Mixed 110 32% 145 MB/s	4K Read 20.7 4K Write 43.8 4K Mixed 5.6 62% 23.3 MB/s	DQ Read 20.6 DQ Write 47.9 DQ Mixed 5.26 12% 24.6 MB/s
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 33.2% Great: 44%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$23 574,344 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 466GB free Firmware: KC44 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (81^st percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 119 99 233978072 (03) Spinup time 100 97 0 (04) Start/Stop count 96 96 4398 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 82 60 179544914 (09) Power-on hours count 82 82 15848 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 97 97 3318 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 99 7 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 69 50 538181663 (C2) HDA temperature 31 50 55834574879 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 40 27 233978072 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 -124949188560015 (F1) Unknown 100 253 1323257828 (F2) Unknown 100 253 3716420671	69% Good	Read 118 Write 123 Mixed 105 86% 115 MB/s	4K Read 0.66 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.73 132% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 69% Great: 88%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial Ballistix Sport LT DDR4 2400 C16 1x8GB-$25 20,263 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 1 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	37.6% Below average	MC Read 14.8 MC Write 12 MC Mixed 12.5 37% 13.1 GB/s	SC Read 12.2 SC Write 9.2 SC Mixed 12.1 32% 11.2 GB/s	Latency 110 36% 110 ns
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 37.6% Great: 48%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-AB350-Gaming 3-CF Builds (Compare 2,705 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 45%

Yacht

Desktop 77%

Battleship

Workstation 42%

Speed boat

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-AB350-Gaming 3-CF - $90

CPU
Ryzen 5 1600AMD $110Bench 70%, 392,253 samples	651x
Ryzen 7 1700AMD $195Bench 69%, 144,475 samples	291x
Ryzen 5 1600XAMD $125Bench 74%, 140,440 samples	218x

GPU
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	277x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	190x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	181x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	85x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	80x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	73x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	170x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	98x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $37Bench 84%, 287,720 samples	58x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 85% - Excellent

Total price: $459

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16