Asus Z97-PRO GAMER

Performance Results


Gaming 69% Battle cruiser	Desktop 85% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 58% Gunboat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	85.3% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	96.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (23%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus Z97-PRO GAMER (all builds)
Memory	9.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit 种颜色
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20150304
Uptime	0.4 Days
Run Date	Nov 16 '17 at 12:04
Run Duration	140 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	23%

PC Performing as expected (54^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-4790K-$348 455,746 User benchmarks, average bench 79% SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)	80.1% Excellent	Memory 89 1-Core 115 2-Core 218 80% 141 Pts	4-Core 384 8-Core 574 60% 479 Pts	64-Core 599 37% 599 Pts
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 80.1% Great: 87%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-Ti-$560 214,030 User benchmarks, average bench 79% Asus(1043 8548) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1582 MHz, MLim: 1800 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 376.53 Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	85.3% Excellent	Lighting 111 Reflection 112 Parallax 101 90% 108 fps	MRender 93.1 Gravity 99 Splatting 86.8 76% 93 fps
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 85.3% Great: 87%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Toshiba THNS128GG4BBAA 128GB 436 User benchmarks, average bench 31% 88GB free Firmware: AGSA0203 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 99 0 (02) Throughput performance 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 12425 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 1442 (A7) Unknown 100 100 0 (A8) Unknown 100 100 0 (A9) Unknown 100 100 1378812821936 (AA) Unknown 100 100 107383357538 (AD) Unknown 100 100 8620933278 (AF) Unknown 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 216 (C2) HDA temperature 61 43 244813856807 (F0) Head flying hours 100 100 0	39.9% Below average	Read 204 Write 140 Mixed 188 39% 177 MB/s	4K Read 26.1 4K Write 37.6 4K Mixed 11.9 75% 25.2 MB/s	DQ Read 26.7 DQ Write 40.1 DQ Mixed 9.35 14% 25.4 MB/s
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 39.9% Great: 40%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 69GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT01B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (28^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 6351 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 677 (B1) Unknown 99 99 17 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 53 46 47 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 28 (F1) Unknown 99 99 8608754166	96.7% Outstanding	Read 501 Write 401 Mixed 408 97% 436 MB/s	4K Read 44 4K Write 98.4 4K Mixed 27.2 154% 56.5 MB/s	DQ Read 45.2 DQ Write 277 DQ Mixed 91.4 91% 138 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 96.7% Great: 124%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$31 1,562,409 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 583GB free Firmware: CC41 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (21^st percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 67 63 5908646 (03) Spinup time 97 97 0 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 763 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 68 60 73124190969 (09) Power-on hours count 93 93 6347 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 341 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 99 30065229831 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 59 51 756351017 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 936 (C2) HDA temperature 41 14 60129542185 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 5 1 5908646 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 127496104187864 (F1) Unknown 100 253 23794806902 (F2) Unknown 100 253 25985992703	75% Very good	Read 144 Write 118 Mixed 112 93% 124 MB/s	4K Read 0.73 4K Write 0.68 4K Mixed 0.24 70% 0.55 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 75% Great: 112%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
HyperX Savage DDR3 2400 C11 2x8GB 20,216 User benchmarks, average bench 63% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing below potential (36^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	55.6% Above average	MC Read 20.6 MC Write 20.7 MC Mixed 16.9 55% 19.4 GB/s	SC Read 12.9 SC Write 18.2 SC Mixed 15.9 45% 15.7 GB/s	Latency 68.5 58% 68.5 ns
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 55.6% Great: 86%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Z97-PRO GAMER Builds (Compare 2,861 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 42%

Speed boat

Desktop 84%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 36%

Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus Z97-PRO GAMER

CPU
Core i7-4790KIntel $348Bench 79%, 455,746 samples	1,398x
Core i5-4690KIntel $53Bench 70%, 229,359 samples	542x
Core i7-4790Intel $135Bench 71%, 255,027 samples	293x

GPU
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	454x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	220x
GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples	181x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	187x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	107x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	74x

RAM
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	126x
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 54%, 77,652 samples	108x
Savage DDR3 2400 C11 2x8GBHyperXBench 63%, 20,216 samples	103x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 60% - Above average

Total price: $648

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16