Performance Results


Gaming 8% Tree trunk	Desktop 59% Gunboat	Workstation 7% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	10.5% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Motherboard	Asus StrikerExtreme (all builds)
Memory	5.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display	1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20100301
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Nov 16 '17 at 18:46
Run Duration	332 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	2%

PC Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 Duo E8600-$180 6,109 User benchmarks, average bench 44% Socket 775, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 4 GHz Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	52.8% Above average	Memory 88.2 1-Core 57.2 2-Core 109 55% 84.9 Pts	4-Core 105 8-Core 107 14% 106 Pts	64-Core 110 7% 110 Pts
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 52.8% Great: 49%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTX 285 2,842 User benchmarks, average bench 9% Device(0000 0000) 1GB Ram: 1GB, Driver: 342.1 Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	10.5% Very poor	Lighting 14.5 Reflection 10.4 Parallax 6.47 12% 10.4 fps	MRender 10.8 Gravity 11.5 Splatting 7.78 8% 10 fps
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 10.5% Great: 10%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Adaptec Array 13.5TB 873GB free Firmware: V1.0 Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples

Adaptec Array 442GB 350GB free (System drive) Firmware: V1.0 Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples

Samsung 850 Pro 128GB-$70 18,195 User benchmarks, average bench 99% 107GB free Firmware: EXM0 Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	55.1% Above average	Read 227 Write 197 Mixed 210 47% 212 MB/s	4K Read 29.2 4K Write 65.8 4K Mixed 20.3 105% 38.5 MB/s	DQ Read 48.1 DQ Write 82.4 DQ Mixed 0.14 18% 43.5 MB/s
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 55.1% Great: 119%
WD WD10TPVT-00H 1TB 1,893 User benchmarks, average bench 37% 691GB free Firmware: 01.0 Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)	36.4% Below average	Read 63.9 Write 62.7 Mixed 61.4 47% 62.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.3 4K Write 1.45 4K Mixed 0.13 53% 0.62 MB/s
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 36.4% Great: 49%
WD WD10TPVT-00H 1TB 1,893 User benchmarks, average bench 37% 531GB free Firmware: 01.0 Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)	42.8% Average	Read 70.5 Write 78.5 Mixed 60.4 52% 69.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.26 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.12 53% 0.66 MB/s
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 42.8% Great: 49%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 4x2GB 183,252 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 4 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR2 Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)	23.7% Poor	MC Read 7.2 MC Write 7.9 MC Mixed 5.9 20% 7 GB/s	SC Read 8 SC Write 8 SC Mixed 6.5 22% 7.5 GB/s	Latency 69.3 58% 69.3 ns
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 23.7% Great: 45%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 43%

Speed boat

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

CPU
Core2 Duo E6850Intel $57Bench 40%, 4,150 samples	3x
Core2 Quad Q9400Intel $170Bench 46%, 24,176 samples	2x
Core2 Quad Q6600Intel $100Bench 42%, 59,658 samples	2x

GPU
GeForce 8800 UltraNvidiaBench 6%, 122 samples	3x
GTX 570Nvidia $350Bench 20%, 22,303 samples	2x
GTX 670Nvidia $435Bench 28%, 47,610 samples	1x

Value: 61% - Good

Total price: $57

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16