| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (83rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 17 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
| Graphics | 54.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
| Motherboard | Gigabyte GA-EX58-UD5 (all builds) |
| Memory | 8.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 0.8 GHz |
| Display | 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colores |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20120110 |
| Uptime | 3 Days |
| Run Date | Nov 19 '17 at 16:51 |
| Run Duration | 128 Seconds |
| Run User | ESP-User |
| Background CPU | 4% |
PC Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i7-920-$90
Socket 1366, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
|
77.5%
Very good
|
76% 128 Pts
|
48% 387 Pts
|
29% 466 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
AMD R9 290-$399
XFX(1682 9395) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1010 MHz, MLim: 1310 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 17.11.1
|
54.8%
Above average
|
55% 70.5 fps
|
54% 64.4 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung 840 Evo 500GB-$150
143GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0DB6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
|
||||
|
|
113%
Outstanding
|
139% 186 MB/s
|
141% 1.33 MB/s
| |
|
|
||||
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown 2x8GB
2 of 6 slots used
16GB DIMM
Performing below potential (31st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
49%
Average
|
46% 16.2 GB/s
|
38% 13.3 GB/s
|
83% 48.4 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical GA-EX58-UD5 Builds (Compare 475 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-EX58-UD5
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i7-920Intel $90Bench 62%, 69,074 samples | 209x |
| Xeon X5675IntelBench 75%, 8,072 samples | 48x |
| Core i7 930Intel $199Bench 64%, 19,497 samples | 30x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 33x |
| GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 30x |
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 24x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 53% - Above average | Total price: $390 |