Asus PRIME X399-A

Performance Results


Gaming 94% Nuclear submarine	Desktop 87% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 95% Nuclear submarine


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	114% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	198% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus PRIME X399-A (all builds)
Memory	12.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170811
Uptime	2 Days
Run Date	Nov 19 '17 at 17:22
Run Duration	153 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	9%

Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen TR 1900X-$110 7,071 User benchmarks, average bench 76% SP3r2, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 4.1 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	84% Excellent	Memory 77 1-Core 125 2-Core 246 82% 149 Pts	4-Core 488 8-Core 827 80% 657 Pts	64-Core 1,376 85% 1,376 Pts
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 84% Great: 87%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$400 1,082,454 User benchmarks, average bench 102% MSI(1462 3364) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2050 MHz, MLim: 2740 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 388.13 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	114% Outstanding	Lighting 153 Reflection 153 Parallax 143 125% 150 fps	MRender 125 Gravity 147 Splatting 115 105% 129 fps
Poor: 93% ↑ This bench: 114% Great: 110%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43 165,668 User benchmarks, average bench 213% 419GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)	198% Outstanding	Read 1,823 Write 1,391 Mixed 1,189 325% 1,468 MB/s	4K Read 38.9 4K Write 59.2 4K Mixed 27.5 126% 41.9 MB/s	DQ Read 38.3 DQ Write 58.4 DQ Mixed 18.9 23% 38.6 MB/s
Poor: 153% ↑ This bench: 198% Great: 254%
Kingston SSDNow UV400 240GB-$89 105,079 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 223GB free Firmware: 0C3FD6SD Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 605 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 320 (64) Unknown 100 100 992480 (65) Unknown 100 100 243200 (AA) Unknown 100 100 0 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AE) Unknown 100 100 52 (AF) Unknown 100 100 0 (B0) Unknown 100 100 0 (B1) Unknown 100 100 298 (B2) Unknown 100 100 0 (B4) Unknown 100 100 1264 (B7) Unknown 100 100 5 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 23 100 176094380055 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 0 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 100 100 0 (CC) Soft ECC correction 100 100 0 (E7) Temperature 99 99 1 (E9) Unknown 100 100 1775 (EA) Unknown 100 100 951 (F1) Unknown 100 100 1525 (F2) Unknown 100 100 1293 (FA) Read error retry rate 100 100 0	50.5% Above average	Read 437 Write 236 Mixed 240 67% 304 MB/s	4K Read 21.6 4K Write 23.4 4K Mixed 6.74 54% 17.3 MB/s	DQ Read 98.3 DQ Write 52.9 DQ Mixed 6.73 23% 52.7 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 50.5% Great: 88%
Crucial MX300 1TB-$130 21,936 User benchmarks, average bench 91% 67GB free Firmware: M0CR050 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 101 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 52 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 100 100 3 (AE) Unknown 100 100 23 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 75 63 158914969625 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 100 100 0 (CE) Flying height 100 100 0 (F6) Unknown 100 100 3885304782 (F7) Unknown 100 100 121530168 (F8) Unknown 100 100 54864286 (B4) Unknown 0 0 4408 (D2) Unknown 100 100 0	56% Above average	Read 435 Write 306 Mixed 308 78% 350 MB/s	4K Read 20.7 4K Write 36 4K Mixed 10.5 64% 22.4 MB/s	DQ Read 19.8 DQ Write 35.9 DQ Mixed 35.6 25% 30.4 MB/s
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 56% Great: 105%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL Trident Z RGB DDR4 3000 C16 2x8GB-$56 84,291 User benchmarks, average bench 81% 2 of 8 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 2133 MHz clocked @ 1067 MHz Performing below potential (2^nd percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	41.8% Average	MC Read 13.9 MC Write 14.4 MC Mixed 13.5 40% 13.9 GB/s	SC Read 15 SC Write 15.1 SC Mixed 13.5 42% 14.5 GB/s	Latency 86.3 46% 86.3 ns
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 41.8% Great: 101%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical PRIME X399-A Builds (Compare 525 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 99%

Nuclear submarine

Desktop 86%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 120%

UFO

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X399-A

CPU
Ryzen TR 1950XAMD $225Bench 77%, 23,641 samples	184x
Ryzen TR 1920XAMD $800Bench 78%, 10,440 samples	124x
Ryzen TR 2950XAMD $798Bench 81%, 10,169 samples	74x

GPU
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $499Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	47x
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	33x
RTX 2070Nvidia $200Bench 104%, 478,117 samples	27x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $76Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	24x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $158Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	22x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 273%, 381,216 samples	22x

RAM
Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBG.SKILL $113Bench 91%, 87,239 samples	11x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 4x16GBCorsairBench 96%, 10,311 samples	10x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GBCorsair $160Bench 88%, 110,884 samples	10x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 80% - Very good

Total price: $913

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $132	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16