Asus MAXIMUS V FORMULA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 102%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 79%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics113% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive105% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago.
MotherboardAsus MAXIMUS V FORMULA  (all builds)
Memory10.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20121221
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 20 '17 at 00:04
Run Duration250 Seconds
Run User GRC-User
Background CPU 15%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3570K-$136
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
88.7% Excellent
Memory 97.7
1-Core 127
2-Core 252
90% 159 Pts
4-Core 462
8-Core 454
62% 458 Pts
64-Core 464
29% 464 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 88.7%
Great: 79%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$400
Gigabyte(1458 3745) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2062 MHz, MLim: 2551 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 388.31
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
113% Outstanding
Lighting 151
Reflection 165
Parallax 156
123% 157 fps
MRender 121
Gravity 149
Splatting 117
105% 129 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 113%
Great: 110%
Intel HD 4000 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)-$15
Asus(1043 84CA) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4653
Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 3% Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Pro 256GB-$155
151GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXM02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
105% Outstanding
Read 512
Write 470
Mixed 416
104% 466 MB/s
4K Read 31.4
4K Write 71.9
4K Mixed 38
134% 47.1 MB/s
DQ Read 312
DQ Write 335
DQ Mixed 153
162% 267 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 105%
Great: 124%
HyperX Fury 120GB-$160
41GB free
Firmware: 580ABBF0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
51.3% Above average
Read 341
Write 110
Mixed 127
42% 192 MB/s
4K Read 22
4K Write 78.7
4K Mixed 13.8
93% 38.2 MB/s
DQ Read 79.1
DQ Write 108
DQ Mixed 29.5
40% 72.1 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 51.3%
Great: 75%
WD WD6000HLHX-01JJPV0 600GB
241GB free
Firmware: 04.05G04 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
82.6% Excellent
Read 151
Write 136
Mixed 10.3
71% 99.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.83
4K Write 3.19
4K Mixed 0.61
161% 1.54 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 82.6%
Great: 80%
WD Blue 320GB (2007)-$80
115GB free
Firmware: 12.01B02 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
32% Below average
Read 57
Write 53.9
Mixed 50.8
40% 53.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.69
4K Write 2.19
4K Mixed 0.46
120% 1.11 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 32%
Great: 58%
WD WD5000AAVS-00ZTB0 500GB
64GB free
Firmware: 05.04C05 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
37.5% Below average
Read 63.6
Write 66.8
Mixed 54.1
46% 61.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.42
4K Write 1.89
4K Mixed 0.25
80% 0.85 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 37.5%
Great: 44%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
HyperX Savage DDR3 2400 C11 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
81.6% Excellent
MC Read 29.6
MC Write 31.2
MC Mixed 25.2
82% 28.7 GB/s
SC Read 22.1
SC Write 21.6
SC Mixed 23.4
64% 22.4 GB/s
Latency 47.2
85% 47.2 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 81.6%
Great: 86%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MAXIMUS V FORMULA Builds (Compare 708 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 59%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 49%
Yacht

Motherboard: Asus MAXIMUS V FORMULA - $349

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 99% - Outstanding Total price: $722
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback