| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 41.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average. |
| Graphics | 36.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen. |
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago.
| Motherboard | Asus P5K-E (all builds) |
| Memory | 4.4 GB free of 6 GB @ 0.8 GHz |
| Display | 1600 x 1024 - 32 Bit renk |
| OS | Windows 8.1 |
| BIOS Date | 20090619 |
| Uptime | 1.3 Days |
| Run Date | Nov 20 '17 at 15:34 |
| Run Duration | 128 Seconds |
| Run User | TUR-User |
| Background CPU | 2% |
PC Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
41.2%
Average
|
39% 57.6 Pts
|
9% 67.8 Pts
|
4% 65.5 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 388.31
|
36.3%
Below average
|
38% 39.9 fps
|
33% 40.2 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
76.1%
Very good
|
91% 122 MB/s
|
93% 0.99 MB/s
| |
|
|
35.9%
Below average
|
42% 56.7 MB/s
|
88% 0.7 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown 3x2GB
3 of 4 slots used
6GB DIMM DDR
Performing below potential (32nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
18.8%
Very poor
|
17% 5.87 GB/s
|
15% 5.3 GB/s
|
41% 98.2 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical P5K-E Builds (Compare 183 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus P5K-E
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core2 Quad Q6600Intel $100Bench 42%, 59,658 samples | 55x |
| Core2 Duo E8400Intel $89Bench 40%, 68,540 samples | 17x |
| Core2 Quad Q9650Intel $170Bench 51%, 16,719 samples | 15x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GT 1030NvidiaBench 14%, 185,384 samples | 10x |
| GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples | 9x |
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 8x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 43% - Average | Total price: $180 |