Asus PRIME Z370-A

Performance Results


Gaming 97% Nuclear submarine	Desktop 106% UFO	Workstation 84% Aircraft carrier


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (85th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 15 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 103%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics	89.3% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	285% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asus PRIME Z370-A (all builds)
Memory	13.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kolorów
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20171101
Uptime	0.5 Days
Run Date	Nov 21 '17 at 06:05
Run Duration	194 Seconds
Run User	POL-User
Background CPU	2%

Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (85^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-8600K-$173 264,837 User benchmarks, average bench 91% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	103% Outstanding	Memory 97.5 1-Core 146 2-Core 292 99% 179 Pts	4-Core 585 8-Core 866 90% 725 Pts	64-Core 866 54% 866 Pts
Poor: 79% ↑ This bench: 103% Great: 101%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132 1,459,281 User benchmarks, average bench 80% Nvidia(10DE 1B81) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2037 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 388.31 Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	89.3% Excellent	Lighting 114 Reflection 119 Parallax 99.3 92% 111 fps	MRender 97.2 Gravity 103 Splatting 103 83% 101 fps
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 89.3% Great: 88%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43 165,668 User benchmarks, average bench 213% 102GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B7Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	285% Outstanding	Read 2,772 Write 1,397 Mixed 1,413 409% 1,861 MB/s	4K Read 57.9 4K Write 142 4K Mixed 51.1 229% 83.8 MB/s	DQ Read 508 DQ Write 388 DQ Mixed 184 210% 360 MB/s
Poor: 153% ↑ This bench: 285% Great: 254%
OCZ Vertex 3 120GB-$42 25,948 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 77GB free Firmware: 2.25 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (47^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 102 102 6981206 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 3 (09) Power-on hours count 75 75 23673859758107 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1592 (AB) Unknown 0 0 3 (AC) Unknown 0 0 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 274 (B1) Unknown 0 0 4 (B5) Unknown 0 0 3 (B6) Unknown 0 0 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 128 129 545469300864 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 120 120 6981206 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 3 (C9) Soft read error rate 120 120 6981206 (CC) Soft ECC correction 120 120 6981206 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 100 (E7) Temperature 99 99 0 (E9) Unknown 0 0 20824 (EA) Unknown 0 0 17125 (F1) Unknown 0 0 17125 (F2) Unknown 0 0 30578	67.6% Good	Read 472 Write 139 Mixed 213 60% 275 MB/s	4K Read 26.2 4K Write 108 4K Mixed 15.5 117% 49.9 MB/s	DQ Read 149 DQ Write 150 DQ Mixed 44 62% 114 MB/s
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 67.6% Great: 82%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016)-$51 462,780 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 2TB free Firmware: CC26 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (64^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 101 100 3548456 (03) Spinup time 96 96 0 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 9 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 14815 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 3 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 10 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 75 72 420741145 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 3 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 48 (C2) HDA temperature 25 40 85899345945 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 75290776698881 (F1) Unknown 100 253 149868947 (F2) Unknown 100 253 1842437	99.9% Outstanding	Read 166 Write 183 Mixed 158 127% 169 MB/s	4K Read 0.78 4K Write 1.42 4K Mixed 0.23 85% 0.81 MB/s
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 99.9% Great: 114%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70 337,642 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 278GB free Firmware: JC4B Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 119 99 216352433 (03) Spinup time 100 100 0 (04) Start/Stop count 95 95 6125 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 84 60 298721926 (09) Power-on hours count 75 75 22020 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 95 95 6116 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 99 76 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 74 46 437518362 (C2) HDA temperature 26 54 64424509466 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 50 26 216352433 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 -68753836435335 (F1) Unknown 100 253 1970670425 (F2) Unknown 100 253 3209704732	66.9% Good	Read 115 Write 118 Mixed 103 84% 112 MB/s	4K Read 0.67 4K Write 1.33 4K Mixed 0.35 91% 0.78 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 66.9% Great: 68%
Samsung HD403LJ 400GB-$183 4,107 User benchmarks, average bench 31% 4GB free Firmware: CT100-12 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 253 87 0 (03) Spinup time 100 100 7488 (04) Start/Stop count 84 84 16605 (05) Reallocated sector count 66 66 324 (07) Seek error rate 253 253 0 (08) Seek timer performance 253 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 36876 (0A) Spinup retry count 253 253 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 253 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 92 92 8864 (0D) Soft read error rate 100 100 14812 (BB) vendor-specific 1 1 4063512 (BC) Unknown 95 95 530 (BE) vendor-specific 77 46 23 (C2) HDA temperature 166 76 24 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 14812 (C4) Reallocation count 66 66 324 (C5) Current pending sector count 97 89 35 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 253 253 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 1473 (C8) Write error rate 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 253 97 0 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 99 99 512	38.3% Below average	Read 64.4 Write 69.1 Mixed 48 45% 60.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.45 4K Write 1.05 4K Mixed 0.23 64% 0.58 MB/s
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 38.3% Great: 42%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB 6,868 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	99.4% Outstanding	MC Read 39.4 MC Write 37.9 MC Mixed 28.1 100% 35.1 GB/s	SC Read 21.8 SC Write 35.9 SC Mixed 30.5 84% 29.4 GB/s	Latency 48.3 83% 48.3 ns
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 99.4% Great: 103%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical PRIME Z370-A Builds (Compare 11,129 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 110%

UFO

Desktop 91%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 100%

UFO

Motherboard: Asus PRIME Z370-A - $132

CPU
Core i7-8700KIntel $186Bench 88%, 746,287 samples	5,933x
Core i5-8600KIntel $173Bench 91%, 264,837 samples	2,108x
Core i7-8700Intel $200Bench 87%, 349,567 samples	923x

GPU
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	1,107x
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	1,056x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	737x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	534x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 273%, 381,216 samples	488x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $76Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	403x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	841x
Trident Z RGB DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $55Bench 84%, 215,644 samples	313x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 4x8GBCorsairBench 87%, 76,101 samples	305x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 71% - Very good

Total price: $926

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16