Asus Z97-PRO GAMER

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics20.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive103% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
High background CPU (24%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus Z97-PRO GAMER  (all builds)
Memory22.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20150521
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateNov 21 '17 at 14:42
Run Duration314 Seconds
Run User GRC-User
Background CPU 24%

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4790K-$348
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
86.3% Excellent
Memory 94.9
1-Core 125
2-Core 250
88% 157 Pts
4-Core 421
8-Core 597
64% 509 Pts
64-Core 661
41% 661 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 86.3%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R7 260X-$120
Asus(1043 04D3) 2GB
CLim: 1075 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 17.11.2
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
20.2% Poor
Lighting 24.7
Reflection 27.9
Parallax 30
20% 27.6 fps
MRender 23
Gravity 22.6
Splatting 27.3
20% 24.3 fps
Poor: 18%
This bench: 20.2%
Great: 22%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$109
50GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT01B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Read 505
Write 398
Mixed 162
78% 355 MB/s
4K Read 41.4
4K Write 90.6
4K Mixed 35.4
156% 55.8 MB/s
DQ Read 296
DQ Write 238
DQ Mixed 111
126% 215 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 103%
Great: 134%
Seagate Barracuda Green 1.5TB-$130
261GB free
Firmware: CC3C Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
42.7% Average
Read 75.2
Write 73.7
Mixed 40.5
47% 63.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.74
4K Mixed 0.46
86% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 42.7%
Great: 69%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$70
125GB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
33% Below average
Read 56.3
Write 58.3
Mixed 30.1
36% 48.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.41
4K Write 1.74
4K Mixed 0.17
68% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 33%
Great: 67%
WD WD10EACS-00ZJB0 1TB
41GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
36.7% Below average
Read 59.6
Write 67.8
Mixed 60.4
47% 62.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.58
4K Write 1.98
4K Mixed 0.29
93% 0.95 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 36.7%
Great: 51%
WD My Book 1140 2TB
609GB free, PID 1140
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
34.4% Below average
Read 86.9
Write 78.2
Mixed 51.3
89% 72.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.46
4K Write 1.53
4K Mixed 0.15
59% 0.71 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 34.4%
Great: 49%
WD My Passport 083A 2TB
339GB free, PID 083a
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
17.1% Very poor
Read 51.4
Write 22
Mixed 39.2
44% 37.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.37
4K Write 1.56
4K Mixed 0.19
61% 0.71 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 17.1%
Great: 45%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL RipjawsX DDR3 1600 C9 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
56.1% Above average
MC Read 19.9
MC Write 20.9
MC Mixed 18.2
56% 19.7 GB/s
SC Read 8.6
SC Write 17.1
SC Mixed 15.6
39% 13.8 GB/s
Latency 57.4
70% 57.4 ns
Poor: 39%
This bench: 56.1%
Great: 65%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z97-PRO GAMER Builds (Compare 2,860 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus Z97-PRO GAMER

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Above average Total price: $648
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $274Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback