MSI B250 KRAIT GAMING (MS-7A68)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 93%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 83%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics115% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive211% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemMSI MS-7A68
MotherboardMSI B250 KRAIT GAMING (MS-7A68)  (all builds)
Memory11.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170406
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateDec 03 '17 at 19:59
Run Duration310 Seconds
Run User MEX-User
Background CPU5%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700K-$180
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
80.1% Excellent
Memory 91.1
1-Core 95.6
2-Core 192
74% 126 Pts
4-Core 372
8-Core 699
64% 535 Pts
64-Core 706
44% 706 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 80.1%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$400
Gigabyte(1458 3711) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2062 MHz, MLim: 2551 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 388.31
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
115% Outstanding
Lighting 153
Reflection 163
Parallax 139
125% 152 fps
MRender 122
Gravity 149
Splatting 118
105% 130 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 115%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 950 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$625
239GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B0Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
211% Outstanding
Read 2,164
Write 884
Mixed 1,175
309% 1,408 MB/s
4K Read 48.5
4K Write 174
4K Mixed 35.6
211% 85.9 MB/s
DQ Read 51.3
DQ Write 334
DQ Mixed 170
138% 185 MB/s
Poor: 138%
This bench: 211%
Great: 283%
Seagate ST10000NM0016-1T 10TB
6.5TB free
Firmware: SND0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 13% Great: 110%
Seagate IronWolf 10TB (2016)-$239
6TB free
Firmware: SC60 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
120% Outstanding
Read 231
Write 186
Mixed 181
150% 199 MB/s
4K Read 0.77
4K Write 4.29
4K Mixed 0.34
149% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 120%
Great: 113%
Seagate IronWolf 10TB (2016)-$239
5.5TB free
Firmware: SC60 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
101% Outstanding
Read 180
Write 172
Mixed 149
125% 167 MB/s
4K Read 1.94
4K Write 4.17
4K Mixed 0.28
189% 2.13 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 101%
Great: 113%
Seagate Desktop HDD 4TB (2013)-$52
3.5TB free
Firmware: CC52 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
77.2% Very good
Read 136
Write 134
Mixed 129
100% 133 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.04
4K Mixed 0.21
72% 0.65 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 77.2%
Great: 96%
Seagate Desktop HDD 4TB (2013)-$52
3.5TB free
Firmware: CC52 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
76.6% Very good
Read 119
Write 148
Mixed 133
101% 133 MB/s
4K Read 0.65
4K Write 0.87
4K Mixed 0.21
67% 0.58 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 76.6%
Great: 96%
NOVATEKN vt-DSC 129GB
120GB free, PID 8611
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
7.17% Terrible
Read 16.9
Write 6.3
Mixed 6.47
10% 9.87 MB/s
4K Read 3.16
4K Write 0.85
4K Mixed 0.39
54% 1.47 MB/s
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB-$36
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (23rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
69.4% Good
MC Read 26.5
MC Write 26.2
MC Mixed 19.6
69% 24.1 GB/s
SC Read 16.6
SC Write 27.5
SC Mixed 22.1
63% 22.1 GB/s
Latency 65.6
61% 65.6 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 69.4%
Great: 109%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical B250 KRAIT GAMING (MS-7A68) Builds (Compare 690 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 52%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 45%
Yacht

Motherboard: MSI B250 KRAIT GAMING (MS-7A68)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 97% - Outstanding Total price: $347
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback